Balloon-expandable versus self-expanding valves in severe aortic stenosis with small aortic annulus: an updated meta-analysis
In patients with SAA undergoing TAVR, SEVs offer superior hemodynamic performance, whereas BEVs are associated with fewer conduction disturbances and bleeding events. Both valve platforms yielded similar clinical outcomes, underscoring the need for individualized device selection.
Authors
- Vinícius Carvalho Pereira (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1844-8084)
- Bárbara Samira Mendes
- Michele Schincariol (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8093-4502)
- Meghna Joseph (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5422-2605)
- Paweł Łajczak (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0281-5417)
- Chidubem Ezenna (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3988-6211)
- Igor Antonio Tolentino Narciso
- Luis Rene Puglla Sanchez
- Mrinal Murali Krishna
Institutions
- Baystate Medical Center (US)
- Medical University of Silesia (PL)
- Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (DE)
- Austral University (AR)
- Kerala Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
- Klinikum Fürth (DE)
- Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa (ES)
- Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros (BR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Coronary Artery Disease
- Published
- 2026-02-04
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1097/mca.0000000000001618
- Primary Topic
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00