Organizational alertness and IT-enabled crisis strategies: a quantitative study on exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity

Purpose-The purpose of this study is to examine how organizational alertness is related with IT exploration, IT exploitation, and IT ambidexterity as crisis response strategies and to assess their impact on competitive performance through market capitalizing and operational adjustment under external crisis conditions. Design/methodology/approach-A research model is developed integrating organizational alertness with IT exploration for swift market capitalizing, IT exploitation for swift operational adjustment, and IT ambidexterity for the simultaneous IT exploration and IT exploitation to investigate organizations' strategic specialization in crisis response. Following a survey design approach, data collected from 166 organizations in Austria, Germany and Switzerland during the COVID-19 crisis are analyzed using partial least squares path modeling, mediation and moderation analyses. Findings-Our results highlight the important role of organizational alertness in all three strategies in the crisis context. IT exploration enhances competitive performance through market capitalizing, while IT exploitation ensures operational stability but does not directly improve competitiveness. Contrary to previous research conducted in stable environments, IT ambidexterity generally weakens crisis responses unless both IT exploration and exploitation are highly developed. Originality/value-Our study offers a novel perspective on IT-enabled crisis response strategies, emphasizing the role of organizational alertness in shaping organizations' specialization in either IT exploration or IT exploitation rather than balancing both. Prior research has primarily examined IT ambidexterity in stable environments and assumed universal benefits. Our conceptualization challenges this view by integrating alertness-driven strategic specialization with IT-enabled crisis adaptation and empirically testing it in a highuncertainty crisis context. We extend ambidexterity theory by demonstrating its contingent applicability and highlighting when organizations should prioritize ITexploration or exploitation for effective crisis management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BFH: ARBOR
Published
2025-09-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24451/dspace/12173
Primary Topic
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organizational alertness and IT-enabled crisis strategies: a quantitative study on exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity

Nikolaus Obwegeser, Everist Limaj, Edward Bernroider
BFH: ARBOR
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
article

Organizational alertness and IT-enabled crisis strategies: a quantitative study on exploration, exploitation, and ambidexterity

Nikolaus Obwegeser, Everist Limaj, Edward Bernroider
article en

Abstract

Purpose-The purpose of this study is to examine how organizational alertness is related with IT exploration, IT exploitation, and IT ambidexterity as crisis response strategies and to assess their impact on competitive performance through market capitalizing and operational adjustment under external crisis conditions. Design/methodology/approach-A research model is developed integrating organizational alertness with IT exploration for swift market capitalizing, IT exploitation for swift operational adjustment, and IT ambidexterity for the simultaneous IT exploration and IT exploitation to investigate organizations' strategic specialization in crisis response. Following a survey design approach, data collected from 166 organizations in Austria, Germany and Switzerland during the COVID-19 crisis are analyzed using partial least squares path modeling, mediation and moderation analyses. Findings-Our results highlight the important role of organizational alertness in all three strategies in the crisis context. IT exploration enhances competitive performance through market capitalizing, while IT exploitation ensures operational stability but does not directly improve competitiveness. Contrary to previous research conducted in stable environments, IT ambidexterity generally weakens crisis responses unless both IT exploration and exploitation are highly developed. Originality/value-Our study offers a novel perspective on IT-enabled crisis response strategies, emphasizing the role of organizational alertness in shaping organizations' specialization in either IT exploration or IT exploitation rather than balancing both. Prior research has primarily examined IT ambidexterity in stable environments and assumed universal benefits. Our conceptualization challenges this view by integrating alertness-driven strategic specialization with IT-enabled crisis adaptation and empirically testing it in a highuncertainty crisis context. We extend ambidexterity theory by demonstrating its contingent applicability and highlighting when organizations should prioritize ITexploration or exploitation for effective crisis management.

BFH: ARBOR
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.