Toward Reconstructing Sentencing: Thoughts on Effectuating Racial Justice through Federal Drug Sentencing Amendments

Abstract This essay advances a Reconstruction framework for federal drug sentencing reform, drawing on parallels between the post–Civil War Reconstruction Era and the present need to dismantle racial inequities embedded in the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. While the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s 2025 proposed amendments to USSG § 2D1.1 offered partial steps toward aligning sentencing outcomes with legitimate purposes of punishment, they ultimately fell short of transformative change. This article argues that a Reconstruction model—one that shifts away from incarceration driven by drug type and quantity, and instead emphasizes culpability, rehabilitation, and community-based alternatives—offers a path toward racial equity and sentencing legitimacy. By confronting the racially discriminatory legacy of the War on Drugs and resisting backlash against antiracism, Reconstruction Sentencing reframes punishment as a tool for healing rather than exclusion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Federal Sentencing Reporter
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/10539867-12266021
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Toward Reconstructing Sentencing: Thoughts on Effectuating Racial Justice through Federal Drug Sentencing Amendments

Jefferson Jelani
Federal Sentencing Reporter
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Toward Reconstructing Sentencing: Thoughts on Effectuating Racial Justice through Federal Drug Sentencing Amendments

Jefferson Jelani
article en

Abstract

Abstract This essay advances a Reconstruction framework for federal drug sentencing reform, drawing on parallels between the post–Civil War Reconstruction Era and the present need to dismantle racial inequities embedded in the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. While the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s 2025 proposed amendments to USSG § 2D1.1 offered partial steps toward aligning sentencing outcomes with legitimate purposes of punishment, they ultimately fell short of transformative change. This article argues that a Reconstruction model—one that shifts away from incarceration driven by drug type and quantity, and instead emphasizes culpability, rehabilitation, and community-based alternatives—offers a path toward racial equity and sentencing legitimacy. By confronting the racially discriminatory legacy of the War on Drugs and resisting backlash against antiracism, Reconstruction Sentencing reframes punishment as a tool for healing rather than exclusion.

Federal Sentencing Reporter
St. John's University (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.