Pegmatite evolution and mineralization: insights from tourmaline geochemistry and boron isotopes

• Tourmaline’s major and trace elements decipher its crystallization environment. • Tourmaline in altered country rock has heavier δ 11 B values than that in the pegmatite. • Variations in δ 11 B across tourmaline zones indicate open or closed magmatic system. • No direct correlation was observed between tourmaline’s Li content and mineralization. • The closure of the magmatic system is a critical control for Li mineralization. While the magmatic source and evolution significantly influence rare metal mineralization in pegmatites, a critical unresolved question remains: within the same mining district, some spatially close pegmatites are mineralized while others are not. This highlights the existence of other crucial factors governing pegmatite mineralization. Tourmaline, a common borosilicate mineral in pegmatite systems, serves as a key indicator for deciphering mineralization processes. We studied the tourmaline from the Murong Li deposit (Asia’s largest single-vein Li deposit) using geochemistry, boron isotopes, and mineralogy. Three types were identified: BP-Tur (tourmaline in barren pegmatite), FP-Tur (tourmaline in fertile pegmatite), and AC-Tur (tourmaline in altered country rock). BP-Tur and FP-Tur exhibit pronounced zoning textures, indicating magmatic-hydrothermal formation. BP-Tur crystallized in a low-salinity, high-ƒO 2 , fluid-rich setting. In contrast, FP-Tur formed under initially low ƒO 2 and low salinity, with both parameters increasing during later crystallization. AC-Tur is fine-grained, non-zoned and formed in a low-temperature, high-pressure, high-salinity, and high-ƒO 2 environment. Its heavier δ 11 B values stem from 11 B-enriched magmatic fluids. Systematic boron isotope variations across growth zones in BP-Tur and FP-Tur record magmatic evolution under open and closed conditions, respectively. This interpretation is corroborated by higher estimated pressures for FP-Tur relative to BP-Tur, consistent with fluid loss and pressure decrease in open systems. Unlike previous studies, we find no direct correlation between the contents of Li, Sn, Nb, or Ta in tourmaline and mineralization. Instead, the closure of the magmatic system is a critical control on Li mineralization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ore Geology Reviews
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2026.107156
Primary Topic
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pegmatite evolution and mineralization: insights from tourmaline geochemistry and boron isotopes

Liu Bingli, Xu Wu, Wang Guozhi, Liu Xuemin et al.
Ore Geology Reviews
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
article

Pegmatite evolution and mineralization: insights from tourmaline geochemistry and boron isotopes

Liu Bingli, Xu Wu, Wang Guozhi, Liu Xuemin, Liao Xingjian, Zhao Pufeng, Yang Yuanliang, Yue Dabin
article en

Abstract

• Tourmaline’s major and trace elements decipher its crystallization environment. • Tourmaline in altered country rock has heavier δ 11 B values than that in the pegmatite. • Variations in δ 11 B across tourmaline zones indicate open or closed magmatic system. • No direct correlation was observed between tourmaline’s Li content and mineralization. • The closure of the magmatic system is a critical control for Li mineralization. While the magmatic source and evolution significantly influence rare metal mineralization in pegmatites, a critical unresolved question remains: within the same mining district, some spatially close pegmatites are mineralized while others are not. This highlights the existence of other crucial factors governing pegmatite mineralization. Tourmaline, a common borosilicate mineral in pegmatite systems, serves as a key indicator for deciphering mineralization processes. We studied the tourmaline from the Murong Li deposit (Asia’s largest single-vein Li deposit) using geochemistry, boron isotopes, and mineralogy. Three types were identified: BP-Tur (tourmaline in barren pegmatite), FP-Tur (tourmaline in fertile pegmatite), and AC-Tur (tourmaline in altered country rock). BP-Tur and FP-Tur exhibit pronounced zoning textures, indicating magmatic-hydrothermal formation. BP-Tur crystallized in a low-salinity, high-ƒO 2 , fluid-rich setting. In contrast, FP-Tur formed under initially low ƒO 2 and low salinity, with both parameters increasing during later crystallization. AC-Tur is fine-grained, non-zoned and formed in a low-temperature, high-pressure, high-salinity, and high-ƒO 2 environment. Its heavier δ 11 B values stem from 11 B-enriched magmatic fluids. Systematic boron isotope variations across growth zones in BP-Tur and FP-Tur record magmatic evolution under open and closed conditions, respectively. This interpretation is corroborated by higher estimated pressures for FP-Tur relative to BP-Tur, consistent with fluid loss and pressure decrease in open systems. Unlike previous studies, we find no direct correlation between the contents of Li, Sn, Nb, or Ta in tourmaline and mineralization. Instead, the closure of the magmatic system is a critical control on Li mineralization.

Ore Geology ReviewsVol. 190
China University of Geosciences (CN), Chengdu University of Technology (CN), Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Geological and Geochemical Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.