Comparison of choroidal hypertransmission and retinal pigment epithelium loss for quantification of geographic atrophy across commonly used SD-OCT devices

To compare the consistency of choroidal hypertransmission (HT) and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) loss area measurements among three commonly used spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices and assess their robustness for monitoring of geographic atrophy (GA). Patients with GA were imaged during a single visit using the three different OCT: (1) Heidelberg Spectralis; (2) Zeiss Cirrus; (3) Topcon Maestro2. Expert readers manually annotated a total of 120 OCT volumes for RPE loss and HT. Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) were calculated to quantify the spatial overlap between the lesions within each OCT device. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess inter-device agreement. Spatial overlap between HT and RPE loss ranged from moderate to good, with HT lesions being significantly larger than RPE loss areas across all devices (p < 0.001). Overall agreement was good for HT and RPE loss. Systematic biases emerged, with Cirrus yielding consistently smaller measurements compared to Spectralis or Maestro2. Lesion measurements demonstrated good agreement across all three OCT devices, yet device-dependent differences require caution when comparing data. Accounting for inter-device variability is an essential step toward reliable clinical endpoints and successful integration of automated OCT algorithms into clinical trials and routine AMD care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38182-7
Primary Topic
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of choroidal hypertransmission and retinal pigment epithelium loss for quantification of geographic atrophy across commonly used SD-OCT devices

Anna Eidenberger, Markus Gumpinger, Johannes Schrittwieser, Klaudia Birner et al.
Scientific Reports
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
article

Comparison of choroidal hypertransmission and retinal pigment epithelium loss for quantification of geographic atrophy across commonly used SD-OCT devices

Anna Eidenberger, Markus Gumpinger, Johannes Schrittwieser, Klaudia Birner, Merle Tratnig-Frankl, Sophie Frank-Publig, Ursula Schmidt-Erfurth
article en

Abstract

To compare the consistency of choroidal hypertransmission (HT) and retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) loss area measurements among three commonly used spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) devices and assess their robustness for monitoring of geographic atrophy (GA). Patients with GA were imaged during a single visit using the three different OCT: (1) Heidelberg Spectralis; (2) Zeiss Cirrus; (3) Topcon Maestro2. Expert readers manually annotated a total of 120 OCT volumes for RPE loss and HT. Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) were calculated to quantify the spatial overlap between the lesions within each OCT device. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess inter-device agreement. Spatial overlap between HT and RPE loss ranged from moderate to good, with HT lesions being significantly larger than RPE loss areas across all devices (p < 0.001). Overall agreement was good for HT and RPE loss. Systematic biases emerged, with Cirrus yielding consistently smaller measurements compared to Spectralis or Maestro2. Lesion measurements demonstrated good agreement across all three OCT devices, yet device-dependent differences require caution when comparing data. Accounting for inter-device variability is an essential step toward reliable clinical endpoints and successful integration of automated OCT algorithms into clinical trials and routine AMD care.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Retinal Diseases and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.