The Evaluation Methods of Menus in University Restaurants: A Scoping Review

University restaurants promote the health and well-being of students and the broader university community by providing balanced, affordable meals that enhance food and nutritional security. This scoping review aimed to map and systematize the methods used for menu evaluations in university restaurants, focusing on quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. From 3118 database records and 64 gray literature sources, 70 studies met the inclusion criteria: 46% used qualitative methods, 33% quantitative, and 21% mixed. This review emphasizes the need for standardized, innovative frameworks integrating nutritional adequacy, user satisfaction, and sustainability. These advancements enhance research and operations in university restaurant management, supporting sustainability and public health.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Food Science and Processing
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.53941/fsp.2026.100003
Primary Topic
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Evaluation Methods of Menus in University Restaurants: A Scoping Review

RITA DE CÁSSIA RIBEIRO, Juliana Costa Liboredo, Marcela Gomes Reis, Nathalia Sernizon Guimarães et al.
Food Science and Processing
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
article

The Evaluation Methods of Menus in University Restaurants: A Scoping Review

RITA DE CÁSSIA RIBEIRO, Juliana Costa Liboredo, Marcela Gomes Reis, Nathalia Sernizon Guimarães, Simone Cardoso Lisboa Pereira, Júlia Naves Peixoto, Bruna Vieira de Costa Lima
article en

Abstract

University restaurants promote the health and well-being of students and the broader university community by providing balanced, affordable meals that enhance food and nutritional security. This scoping review aimed to map and systematize the methods used for menu evaluations in university restaurants, focusing on quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches. From 3118 database records and 64 gray literature sources, 70 studies met the inclusion criteria: 46% used qualitative methods, 33% quantitative, and 21% mixed. This review emphasizes the need for standardized, innovative frameworks integrating nutritional adequacy, user satisfaction, and sustainability. These advancements enhance research and operations in university restaurant management, supporting sustainability and public health.

Food Science and ProcessingVol. 2(1)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.