Invasive versus conservative strategy in older adults ≥70 years of age with non-ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis
Authors
Sourbha S. Dani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3434-6136)
Invasive versus conservative strategy in older adults ≥70 years of age with non-ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis
Sourbha S. Dani, Mohamed Abuelazm, Apurva Vyas, Mustafa Turkmani et al.
Journal
Future Cardiology
Topics
Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
article
Invasive versus conservative strategy in older adults ≥70 years of age with non-ST-segment–elevation myocardial infarction: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials with trial sequential analysis
Sourbha S. Dani, Mohamed Abuelazm, Apurva Vyas, Mustafa Turkmani, Mahmoud Shaaban Abdelgalil, Ubaid Khan, Zuhair Majeed, Anum Nawaz, Ahmed Mazen Amin, Muhammad Haris Khan, Muhammad Aamir, Muhammad Abdullah Naveed, Junaid Ali
article en
Abstract
No abstract available for this paper.
Publication Tag
Future CardiologyVol. 22(3)
Institutions
Ain Shams University (EG), University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Pakistan Atomic Energy Commission (PK), Saint Peter's University Hospital (US), King Edward Medical University (PK), Mansoura University (EG), Tanta University (EG), Saidu Teaching Hospital (PK), Dow University of Health Sciences (PK), Lahey Medical Center (US), University of Toledo (US)