Medical Gaslighting and its Impact on Vulnerable Populations

Medical gaslighting, defined as the minimization or dismissal of a patient's symptoms by healthcare providers, has gained increasing visibility, particularly among marginalized populations. This phenomenon disproportionately impacts individuals facing systemic inequities related to race, gender and class, effects that are compounded at the intersection of these identities. Medical gaslighting contributes to misdiagnosis, delayed care, emotional distress, and long-term mistrust in healthcare systems. Through an intersectional framework and illustrative case studies, this paper examines how implicit bias, structural racism, and the historical mistreatment of marginalized groups contribute to the erasure of patient experiences. The emotional and psychological toll of medical gaslighting further exacerbates existing health disparities. To address this issue, we explore strategies including provider education on implicit bias, expanded patient advocacy, and policy reforms aimed at promoting health equity. These interventions are critical for restoring trust and improving health outcomes, particularly for those most vulnerable to systemic healthcare neglect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-026-02850-1
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
55.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Medical Gaslighting and its Impact on Vulnerable Populations

Anthony D. Slonim, Kryss Shane
1 citations
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
55.57
article

Medical Gaslighting and its Impact on Vulnerable Populations

Anthony D. Slonim, Kryss Shane
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Medical gaslighting, defined as the minimization or dismissal of a patient's symptoms by healthcare providers, has gained increasing visibility, particularly among marginalized populations. This phenomenon disproportionately impacts individuals facing systemic inequities related to race, gender and class, effects that are compounded at the intersection of these identities. Medical gaslighting contributes to misdiagnosis, delayed care, emotional distress, and long-term mistrust in healthcare systems. Through an intersectional framework and illustrative case studies, this paper examines how implicit bias, structural racism, and the historical mistreatment of marginalized groups contribute to the erasure of patient experiences. The emotional and psychological toll of medical gaslighting further exacerbates existing health disparities. To address this issue, we explore strategies including provider education on implicit bias, expanded patient advocacy, and policy reforms aimed at promoting health equity. These interventions are critical for restoring trust and improving health outcomes, particularly for those most vulnerable to systemic healthcare neglect.

Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
University of San Diego (US), Fordham University (US), National University (US), Carilion Clinic (US), Thomas University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
55.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Medical Gaslighting and its Impact on Vulnerable Populations — Anthony D. Slonim, Kryss Shane · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS