Complexities in reflective practice facilitation in a forensic mental health setting

Purpose Research supporting the utility and effectiveness of reflective practice in forensic settings is steadily growing, with recognition that the benefits of structured reflection for staff who work in these environments are significant. However, much of the research examining how to maximise the effectiveness of the reflective process does so from the perspective of session participants. When the perspective of the facilitator is considered, it is generally done so with respect to how to improve the process for group members, as opposed to recognising and addressing the challenges that are faced by facilitators. Design/methodology/approach This paper aims to describe some of the intrapsychic and ethical challenges experienced by facilitators of a Reflective Practice Framework in a forensic mental health setting. Findings Four main challenges are discussed: the pull to problem solve, the importance of bringing “ourselves” into the room, responding to psychological hazards commonly experienced in forensic mental health settings and balancing duty of care and confidentiality. Practical implications The relevant research literature is reflected upon, followed by a description of how facilitators navigated these challenges. Originality/value This paper provides practical support to facilitators of reflective practice in navigating the complexities of delivering this service to staff in a forensic mental health setting and highlights key implications for practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Forensic Practice
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jfp-09-2025-0091
Primary Topic
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complexities in reflective practice facilitation in a forensic mental health setting

Bonnie Albrecht, Diana Talevski, Meera Aurora
Journal of Forensic Practice
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
article

Complexities in reflective practice facilitation in a forensic mental health setting

Bonnie Albrecht, Diana Talevski, Meera Aurora
article en

Abstract

Purpose Research supporting the utility and effectiveness of reflective practice in forensic settings is steadily growing, with recognition that the benefits of structured reflection for staff who work in these environments are significant. However, much of the research examining how to maximise the effectiveness of the reflective process does so from the perspective of session participants. When the perspective of the facilitator is considered, it is generally done so with respect to how to improve the process for group members, as opposed to recognising and addressing the challenges that are faced by facilitators. Design/methodology/approach This paper aims to describe some of the intrapsychic and ethical challenges experienced by facilitators of a Reflective Practice Framework in a forensic mental health setting. Findings Four main challenges are discussed: the pull to problem solve, the importance of bringing “ourselves” into the room, responding to psychological hazards commonly experienced in forensic mental health settings and balancing duty of care and confidentiality. Practical implications The relevant research literature is reflected upon, followed by a description of how facilitators navigated these challenges. Originality/value This paper provides practical support to facilitators of reflective practice in navigating the complexities of delivering this service to staff in a forensic mental health setting and highlights key implications for practice.

Journal of Forensic Practice
Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine (AU), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Complexities in reflective practice facilitation in a forensic mental health setting — Bonnie Albrecht, Diana Talevski, et al. · Journal of Forensic Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS