Roots and reach: Place-Based processes for polycentric governance in rural South Africa

Rural populations in South Africa's former homelands face persistent marginalisation amid institutional weaknesses, corruption, and complex overlaps between traditional and democratic governance systems. Polycentric governance, characterised by semi-autonomous nodes across levels fostering accountability and adaptation, offers a framework for addressing these challenges, yet research on how civil society organisations contribute remains limited. This study examines how place-based civil society organisations emerge and survive to enable desirable systemic change in such contexts. Through research-practice partnerships with seven well-established organisations, data were collected via 160 organisational documents and 20 semi-structured interviews with senior staff. Inductive thematic analysis, timeline mapping, and theories of change diagrams revealed nine interrelated place-based processes framed by two core themes: relations and impact. These processes form a core trajectory, from focused effort to cultivating credibility and enabling learning, that is amplified by reinforcing feedback loops (e.g., re-framing the potential of functional institutions in rural areas) and characterised by tensions such as autonomy versus embeddedness and growth versus grounding. The findings highlight practical lessons for nascent organisations and underscore the need for sustained investment in these organisations as key nodes for systemic learning, rural agency and polycentricity. This work contributes to governance literature by illuminating undervalued sites of innovation, advocating for practice-informed approaches to legitimise and scale rural-led solutions. Identifies nine interrelated place-based processes shaping rural systemic change. Shows civil society organisations as key nodes of polycentric governance. Place-based tensions are autonomy vs. embeddedness and growth vs. grounding. Advocates sustained investment in rural organisations as undervalued sites of innovation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Rural Studies
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2026.104054
Primary Topic
Rural development and sustainability
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Roots and reach: Place-Based processes for polycentric governance in rural South Africa

Anthony St Leger Fry
Journal of Rural Studies
Rural development and sustainability
article

Roots and reach: Place-Based processes for polycentric governance in rural South Africa

Anthony St Leger Fry
article en

Abstract

Rural populations in South Africa's former homelands face persistent marginalisation amid institutional weaknesses, corruption, and complex overlaps between traditional and democratic governance systems. Polycentric governance, characterised by semi-autonomous nodes across levels fostering accountability and adaptation, offers a framework for addressing these challenges, yet research on how civil society organisations contribute remains limited. This study examines how place-based civil society organisations emerge and survive to enable desirable systemic change in such contexts. Through research-practice partnerships with seven well-established organisations, data were collected via 160 organisational documents and 20 semi-structured interviews with senior staff. Inductive thematic analysis, timeline mapping, and theories of change diagrams revealed nine interrelated place-based processes framed by two core themes: relations and impact. These processes form a core trajectory, from focused effort to cultivating credibility and enabling learning, that is amplified by reinforcing feedback loops (e.g., re-framing the potential of functional institutions in rural areas) and characterised by tensions such as autonomy versus embeddedness and growth versus grounding. The findings highlight practical lessons for nascent organisations and underscore the need for sustained investment in these organisations as key nodes for systemic learning, rural agency and polycentricity. This work contributes to governance literature by illuminating undervalued sites of innovation, advocating for practice-informed approaches to legitimise and scale rural-led solutions. Identifies nine interrelated place-based processes shaping rural systemic change. Shows civil society organisations as key nodes of polycentric governance. Place-based tensions are autonomy vs. embeddedness and growth vs. grounding. Advocates sustained investment in rural organisations as undervalued sites of innovation.

Journal of Rural StudiesVol. 123
University of the Witwatersrand (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Rural development and sustainability
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Roots and reach: Place-Based processes for polycentric governance in rural South Africa — Anthony St Leger Fry · Journal of Rural Studies (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS