Organizing media: A political economy typology of alternative media

In this participatory communicative action research (PCAR) project undertaken by the Media Action Research Group (MARG), we use an intersectional political economy framework to better understand how alternative media activists organize and structure their projects. The findings are based on interviews conducted between 2015 and 2019 with 80 media activists in 38 alternative media projects in eleven countries. Based on a granular analysis of the structures and practices of horizontality in grass-roots media projects, we are attentive to five key dimensions of alternative media organizing: structures, funding, labour, imaginaries and intersectional power. This analysis was generative of a typology that categorizes alternative media projects into six ideal types: critical entrepreneurial journalism startups, hybrid vertical–horizontal media projects, hybrid commercial-activist media projects, media workers’ cooperatives, DIY volunteer-run media collectives and DIY autonomous media networks. We find that a strong alignment of media practices and alternative media imaginaries within an alternative media project may be a predictor of its long-term resilience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Alternative & Community Media
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1386/jacm_00147_1
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Organizing media: A political economy typology of alternative media

Sandra Jeppesen, iowyth hezel ulthiin, Emily Faubert, Christopher Petersen
Journal of Alternative & Community Media
Media Studies and Communication
article

Organizing media: A political economy typology of alternative media

Sandra Jeppesen, iowyth hezel ulthiin, Emily Faubert, Christopher Petersen
article en

Abstract

In this participatory communicative action research (PCAR) project undertaken by the Media Action Research Group (MARG), we use an intersectional political economy framework to better understand how alternative media activists organize and structure their projects. The findings are based on interviews conducted between 2015 and 2019 with 80 media activists in 38 alternative media projects in eleven countries. Based on a granular analysis of the structures and practices of horizontality in grass-roots media projects, we are attentive to five key dimensions of alternative media organizing: structures, funding, labour, imaginaries and intersectional power. This analysis was generative of a typology that categorizes alternative media projects into six ideal types: critical entrepreneurial journalism startups, hybrid vertical–horizontal media projects, hybrid commercial-activist media projects, media workers’ cooperatives, DIY volunteer-run media collectives and DIY autonomous media networks. We find that a strong alignment of media practices and alternative media imaginaries within an alternative media project may be a predictor of its long-term resilience.

Journal of Alternative & Community MediaVol. 10(1)
University of Toronto (CA), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA), Lakehead University (CA)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.