Social cognition and decision‐making in people with methamphetamine use disorder

Background and Aims: Impairments in social cognition and social decision‐making play an important role in the disease burden experienced by individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD). They are also assumed to play a role in the vicious cycle of MUD development and hinder its successful psychotherapy. However, research typically focuses on examining specific types of social cognitive deficits in MUD, rather than profiling the multidimensional social cognition and decision‐making impairments that coincide with MUD. Our study, thus, estimated the socio‐cognitive and social decision‐making profile of people with MUD and compared this profile with a methamphetamine‐naïve control group. Design: Cross‐sectional case–control comparison of social cognition and decision‐making between participants with MUD recruited from clinical services and methamphetamine‐naïve controls (CTRL) recruited from the community. Setting: Drug treatment clinics in Melbourne, Australia.Participants52 participants with MUD (moderate or severe; 77% identified as male) between April 2019 and September 2021 and 51 demographically matched CTRLs (no history of methamphetamine use; 54% identified as male) between May and September of 2021. Measurements: We implemented a social cognition battery that assessed a participant's sensitivity for perceiving emotion from faces (emotion recognition) and their ability to detect accurately the emotional state of others (cognitive empathy) and experience the emotions of others (emotional empathy). We also characterised the propensity to engage in higher‐order social decision‐making by assessing a participant's willingness to engage in interpersonal trust and aggression in experimental simulations. Findings: Compared with matched controls, people with MUD had a bias toward perceiving happier facial expressions as neutral [Estimate = −5.05, standard error (SE) = 2.05, P = 0.016, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = (−9.12 to −0.98)], showing lower sensitivity to perceiving happy emotions [Estimate = −6.34, SE = 3.09, P = 0.043, 95% CI = (−12.47 to −0.20)]. People with MUD also showed a propensity to enact more intense punishments [Estimate = 1.48, SE = 0.38, P < 0.001, 95% CI = (0.73–2.23)] and lower levels of trust to others in their decisions [Estimate = −0.11, SE = 0.04, P = 0.002, 95% CI = (−0.18 to −0.04)]. Conclusions: In a clinical research study, people with methamphetamine use disorder appeared to show lower sensitivity to happy emotions, reduced trust and increased aggression toward others, relative to a matched control group.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-284453
Primary Topic
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Social cognition and decision‐making in people with methamphetamine use disorder

David M. Cole, Lauren Hanegraaf, Antonio Verdejo‐García, Justin Mahlberg et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
article

Social cognition and decision‐making in people with methamphetamine use disorder

David M. Cole, Lauren Hanegraaf, Antonio Verdejo‐García, Justin Mahlberg, Shalini Arunogiri, Josua Zimmermann, Boris B. Quednow
article en

Abstract

Background and Aims: Impairments in social cognition and social decision‐making play an important role in the disease burden experienced by individuals with methamphetamine use disorder (MUD). They are also assumed to play a role in the vicious cycle of MUD development and hinder its successful psychotherapy. However, research typically focuses on examining specific types of social cognitive deficits in MUD, rather than profiling the multidimensional social cognition and decision‐making impairments that coincide with MUD. Our study, thus, estimated the socio‐cognitive and social decision‐making profile of people with MUD and compared this profile with a methamphetamine‐naïve control group. Design: Cross‐sectional case–control comparison of social cognition and decision‐making between participants with MUD recruited from clinical services and methamphetamine‐naïve controls (CTRL) recruited from the community. Setting: Drug treatment clinics in Melbourne, Australia.Participants52 participants with MUD (moderate or severe; 77% identified as male) between April 2019 and September 2021 and 51 demographically matched CTRLs (no history of methamphetamine use; 54% identified as male) between May and September of 2021. Measurements: We implemented a social cognition battery that assessed a participant's sensitivity for perceiving emotion from faces (emotion recognition) and their ability to detect accurately the emotional state of others (cognitive empathy) and experience the emotions of others (emotional empathy). We also characterised the propensity to engage in higher‐order social decision‐making by assessing a participant's willingness to engage in interpersonal trust and aggression in experimental simulations. Findings: Compared with matched controls, people with MUD had a bias toward perceiving happier facial expressions as neutral [Estimate = −5.05, standard error (SE) = 2.05, P = 0.016, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = (−9.12 to −0.98)], showing lower sensitivity to perceiving happy emotions [Estimate = −6.34, SE = 3.09, P = 0.043, 95% CI = (−12.47 to −0.20)]. People with MUD also showed a propensity to enact more intense punishments [Estimate = 1.48, SE = 0.38, P < 0.001, 95% CI = (0.73–2.23)] and lower levels of trust to others in their decisions [Estimate = −0.11, SE = 0.04, P = 0.002, 95% CI = (−0.18 to −0.04)]. Conclusions: In a clinical research study, people with methamphetamine use disorder appeared to show lower sensitivity to happy emotions, reduced trust and increased aggression toward others, relative to a matched control group.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 34%
Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.