Evaluating algorithmic approaches to rare disease case-finding: a retrospective validation study using electronic health records

Accurate and early diagnosis to optimise rare disease care is a global priority. With recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI)-based solutions, a promising area to improve rare disease diagnosis is the application of AI to routinely collected health care data captured in electronic health records (EHRs). MendelScan is a rare disease case-finding tool that analyses structured EHR data, using algorithms to identify patterns that are associated with an increased likelihood of the patient being affected by one of a number of rare diseases, in order to put such patients forward for further review. In this paper, we evaluated the performance of case-finding algorithms for 34 rare diseases within MendelScan, by performing a retrospective validation study using research EHR data. The primary objectives were to assess MendelScan’s ability to correctly identify cases versus controls, and to investigate other metrics indicating feasibility of large-scale deployment and time identified (flagged) relative to diagnosis. We measured algorithm performance by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and likelihood ratios. Algorithm performance varied from metric to metric for the different algorithms. Sensitivity ranged from 0 to 100%, but majority were under 25% (median = 3.8% (IQR: 1.2–12.6%)) whereas specificity for most algorithms was above 99.995% (median = 99.9966% (IQR: 99.9925–99.9988)). Median PPV adjusted by literature prevalence was 3.1% (IQR: 0.7–14.6%) and by coded prevalence, 2.5% (IQR: 0.4–8.4). Median positive likelihood ratio was 1167 (IQR: 125–4006), reflecting a strong signal for disease presence, and median negative likelihood ratio was 0.96 (IQR: 0.87–0.99), reflecting limited clinical utility of a negative result. Our findings demonstrate the potential of using routinely collected EHR data to facilitate earlier diagnosis of rare diseases. Real world evaluations are required in order to fully ascertain the impact of such case-finding algorithms in assisting with the detection and diagnosis of patients with rare diseases.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-026-04240-6
Primary Topic
Genomics and Rare Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating algorithmic approaches to rare disease case-finding: a retrospective validation study using electronic health records

E Marchini, Lara Menzies, Hadley Mahon, Jack Sams et al.
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
Genomics and Rare Diseases
article

Evaluating algorithmic approaches to rare disease case-finding: a retrospective validation study using electronic health records

E Marchini, Lara Menzies, Hadley Mahon, Jack Sams, Rand Dubis, Daniel Ollerenshaw, Calum Grant, Elizabeth Varones, Jez Stockdale, Jyothika Kumar, P.J. Fish, Alan Warren, Amanda Worker, William Evans
article en

Abstract

Accurate and early diagnosis to optimise rare disease care is a global priority. With recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI)-based solutions, a promising area to improve rare disease diagnosis is the application of AI to routinely collected health care data captured in electronic health records (EHRs). MendelScan is a rare disease case-finding tool that analyses structured EHR data, using algorithms to identify patterns that are associated with an increased likelihood of the patient being affected by one of a number of rare diseases, in order to put such patients forward for further review. In this paper, we evaluated the performance of case-finding algorithms for 34 rare diseases within MendelScan, by performing a retrospective validation study using research EHR data. The primary objectives were to assess MendelScan’s ability to correctly identify cases versus controls, and to investigate other metrics indicating feasibility of large-scale deployment and time identified (flagged) relative to diagnosis. We measured algorithm performance by sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and likelihood ratios. Algorithm performance varied from metric to metric for the different algorithms. Sensitivity ranged from 0 to 100%, but majority were under 25% (median = 3.8% (IQR: 1.2–12.6%)) whereas specificity for most algorithms was above 99.995% (median = 99.9966% (IQR: 99.9925–99.9988)). Median PPV adjusted by literature prevalence was 3.1% (IQR: 0.7–14.6%) and by coded prevalence, 2.5% (IQR: 0.4–8.4). Median positive likelihood ratio was 1167 (IQR: 125–4006), reflecting a strong signal for disease presence, and median negative likelihood ratio was 0.96 (IQR: 0.87–0.99), reflecting limited clinical utility of a negative result. Our findings demonstrate the potential of using routinely collected EHR data to facilitate earlier diagnosis of rare diseases. Real world evaluations are required in order to fully ascertain the impact of such case-finding algorithms in assisting with the detection and diagnosis of patients with rare diseases.

Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
University of Nottingham (GB), Chapel Allerton Hospital (GB), Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (GB), Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Broomfield Hospital (GB), Mendeley (United Kingdom) (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Genomics and Rare Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.