Step count as a digital mobility outcome in orthopedics and orthopedic trauma surgery: a scoping review

The need to collect objective outcome parameters digitally is increasing in both clinical practice and research. Step count is a frequently utilized digital mobility outcome (DMO) in orthopedic traumatology; however, its usefulness to monitor the patient recovery process remains unclear. The aim of this scoping review is to investigate the application and utility of daily patient step count as a DMO in musculoskeletal injuries. PubMed and consensus.app were queried. Eligibility criteria included the following: articles published within 20 years including patients with orthopedic trauma conditions and utilizing daily step count as an outcome. The type of study, case numbers, conditions investigated, use/usefulness of step count, duration of assessment, sensor use and location, and data harvesting specifics were assessed. Totally, 40 articles were analyzed, revealing an increasing trend in annual publications. The majority of studies were observational (93%), with a mean of 103 participants (range: 9-666). Proximal femur fractures (n = 7), anterior curciate ligament (ACL) injuries (n = 6), and joint replacement (n = 5) were the most frequently investigated conditions. Overall, 30% of studies used step count to demonstrate an association with patient-reported outcome measures, while 27% employed it to identify differences between study groups. Research-grade accelerometers/inertial measurement units (73%) were the most common sensors, with continuous measurement durations from 4 to 14 days. This review indicates an increasing use of step count as an objective DMO in the orthopedic trauma surgery literature. However, the implementation, application, setup, and data acquisition methodologies remain underexplored. This review highlights current trends and identifies key areas requiring further investigation in future research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
EFORT Open Reviews
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1530/eor-2025-0165
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Step count as a digital mobility outcome in orthopedics and orthopedic trauma surgery: a scoping review

Maximilian M. Menger, Tina Histing, Meir Marmor, Bernd Grimm et al.
EFORT Open Reviews
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Step count as a digital mobility outcome in orthopedics and orthopedic trauma surgery: a scoping review

Maximilian M. Menger, Tina Histing, Meir Marmor, Bernd Grimm, Benedikt J. Braun, Carolina Vogel, Georg Osterhoff, J Yu, Y Acklin, David A Back, _ _, G Osgood, M T Marmor, S Schroeter, Dannik Haas, B J Braun
article en

Abstract

The need to collect objective outcome parameters digitally is increasing in both clinical practice and research. Step count is a frequently utilized digital mobility outcome (DMO) in orthopedic traumatology; however, its usefulness to monitor the patient recovery process remains unclear. The aim of this scoping review is to investigate the application and utility of daily patient step count as a DMO in musculoskeletal injuries. PubMed and consensus.app were queried. Eligibility criteria included the following: articles published within 20 years including patients with orthopedic trauma conditions and utilizing daily step count as an outcome. The type of study, case numbers, conditions investigated, use/usefulness of step count, duration of assessment, sensor use and location, and data harvesting specifics were assessed. Totally, 40 articles were analyzed, revealing an increasing trend in annual publications. The majority of studies were observational (93%), with a mean of 103 participants (range: 9-666). Proximal femur fractures (n = 7), anterior curciate ligament (ACL) injuries (n = 6), and joint replacement (n = 5) were the most frequently investigated conditions. Overall, 30% of studies used step count to demonstrate an association with patient-reported outcome measures, while 27% employed it to identify differences between study groups. Research-grade accelerometers/inertial measurement units (73%) were the most common sensors, with continuous measurement durations from 4 to 14 days. This review indicates an increasing use of step count as an objective DMO in the orthopedic trauma surgery literature. However, the implementation, application, setup, and data acquisition methodologies remain underexplored. This review highlights current trends and identifies key areas requiring further investigation in future research.

EFORT Open ReviewsVol. 11(2)
San Francisco General Hospital (US), University of California, San Francisco (US), BG Klinik Tübingen (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Luxembourg Institute of Health (LU), Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.