Measuring child development at the 2–2½-year health and development review in England: a rapid scoping review of available tools
ASQ-3 and CREDI are most promising for use at the 2-2½-year review. However, we lack UK-based validation and norming studies, even for ASQ-3. Ultimately, careful implementation and integration into existing systems will determine a tool's value for identifying developmental needs, supporting families and producing high quality data for public health surveillance.
Authors
- Diane Stoianov
- Joanna Lysons (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0668-0484)
- Jennifer Kirman
- Hannah Cann
- Pasco Fearon
- Jenny Woodman
- Maria Raisa Jessica Aquino
- Sally Kendall
- Melissa Gladstone
- German Alarcon
- Rocio Mendez Pineda
Institutions
- Oxford Brookes University (GB)
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- University of Kent (GB)
- University of Cambridge (GB)
- Families USA (US)
- Liverpool Women's Hospital (GB)
- Child, Adolescent and Family Mental Health (CA)
- University College London (GB)
- Newcastle University (GB)
Publication Details
- Journal
- BMJ Open
- Published
- 2026-02-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102853
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Infant Development and Preterm Care
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 41.22