Bilingualism and Executive Control: A Mini Systematic Review of Behavioral Evidence (2015–2025)

This preprint presents a mini systematic review of behavioral evidence on bilingualism and executive control from 2015 to 2025. Using a transparent Google Scholar search strategy and predefined inclusion criteria, the review synthesizes findings across inhibition, interference control, task switching, and working memory/updating measures, with attention to heterogeneity in bilingual experience definitions (proficiency, daily use, age of acquisition) and confound control (e.g., socioeconomic status, education, immigration context). Overall, the evidence does not support a universal bilingual advantage; observed effects are small, mixed, and context-dependent, varying by task design, measurement choice, and participant characteristics. Practical recommendations are provided for future cognitive science research, including standardized bilingual profiling, multi-task designs, and open research practices.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18486876
Primary Topic
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bilingualism and Executive Control: A Mini Systematic Review of Behavioral Evidence (2015–2025)

Shanin Tasnim
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
article

Bilingualism and Executive Control: A Mini Systematic Review of Behavioral Evidence (2015–2025)

Shanin Tasnim
article en

Abstract

This preprint presents a mini systematic review of behavioral evidence on bilingualism and executive control from 2015 to 2025. Using a transparent Google Scholar search strategy and predefined inclusion criteria, the review synthesizes findings across inhibition, interference control, task switching, and working memory/updating measures, with attention to heterogeneity in bilingual experience definitions (proficiency, daily use, age of acquisition) and confound control (e.g., socioeconomic status, education, immigration context). Overall, the evidence does not support a universal bilingual advantage; observed effects are small, mixed, and context-dependent, varying by task design, measurement choice, and participant characteristics. Practical recommendations are provided for future cognitive science research, including standardized bilingual profiling, multi-task designs, and open research practices.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.