When in Rome, Work from Home? How Organizations Regulate Remote Work in Italy, France, Switzerland, and Quebec

The way in which remote working is interpreted by organizations (by top management, by human resources management), even in its being an element of possible sustainability, may vary in relation to national work cultures and laws, with differences between countries. This study, in particular, aims to trace the differences and similarities in terms of how organizations regulate and manage remote working by considering 294 organizations of four different countries: France (n = 92), Switzerland (n = 82), Italy (n = 60), and Quebec (n = 60). In each country, each response relates to an entire organization. The findings show that perceived pressure from the environment to implement remote working is higher in Quebec (Canada) than in Switzerland and Italy. In terms of regulations, 90% of Quebec organizations reported to have approved an internal regulation for remote working compared with European countries, ranging between 72% (for Italy) and 76% (for France). Finally, the findings confirm the role played by top-management positive beliefs for remote working and pressure from the environment for the implementation of different adaptations: All these findings show differences in particular between Quebec and European countries that are interesting to better understand and debate.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15020093
Primary Topic
Work-Family Balance Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

When in Rome, Work from Home? How Organizations Regulate Remote Work in Italy, France, Switzerland, and Quebec

Valentina Dolce, Tremblay Diane-Gabrielle, Chiara Ghislieri, Sandra Dubouloz et al.
Social Sciences
Work-Family Balance Challenges
article

When in Rome, Work from Home? How Organizations Regulate Remote Work in Italy, France, Switzerland, and Quebec

Valentina Dolce, Tremblay Diane-Gabrielle, Chiara Ghislieri, Sandra Dubouloz, Céline Desmarais
article en

Abstract

The way in which remote working is interpreted by organizations (by top management, by human resources management), even in its being an element of possible sustainability, may vary in relation to national work cultures and laws, with differences between countries. This study, in particular, aims to trace the differences and similarities in terms of how organizations regulate and manage remote working by considering 294 organizations of four different countries: France (n = 92), Switzerland (n = 82), Italy (n = 60), and Quebec (n = 60). In each country, each response relates to an entire organization. The findings show that perceived pressure from the environment to implement remote working is higher in Quebec (Canada) than in Switzerland and Italy. In terms of regulations, 90% of Quebec organizations reported to have approved an internal regulation for remote working compared with European countries, ranging between 72% (for Italy) and 76% (for France). Finally, the findings confirm the role played by top-management positive beliefs for remote working and pressure from the environment for the implementation of different adaptations: All these findings show differences in particular between Quebec and European countries that are interesting to better understand and debate.

Social SciencesVol. 15(2)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Université TÉLUQ (CA), Groupe de Recherche en Psychologie Sociale (FR), HES-SO Vaud (CH), University of Turin (IT), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (FR)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Work-Family Balance Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.