Missed opportunities for innovation and intellectual property in Brazil’s tax reform

Abstract Brazil’s tax reform, established by Constitutional Amendment 132/2023 and regulated by Complementary Law 214/2025, modernizes its fiscal structure but fails to establish a cohesive strategy for the intangible economy. Through a normative-legal and policy analysis, this article examines how the omission of an IP box regime and the introduction of new consumption tax burdens (Imposto sobre Bens e Serviços/Contribuição sobre Bens e Serviços) on IP commercialization affect the capture of IP value, location of intangibles and innovation incentives. Drawing on the economic framework for intangible capital, our analysis finds that the reform creates a severe misalignment between innovation policy and taxation. Sectoral asymmetries, such as preserving constitutional immunity for the book industry while increasing taxes for high-growth sectors like electronic games, weaken IP incentives and Brazil’s international competitiveness, exacerbating existing policy challenges for the intangible economy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Published
2026-01-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpag002
Primary Topic
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Missed opportunities for innovation and intellectual property in Brazil’s tax reform

Rodrigo F. Silva, Suelen Carls
Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
article

Missed opportunities for innovation and intellectual property in Brazil’s tax reform

Rodrigo F. Silva, Suelen Carls
article en

Abstract

Abstract Brazil’s tax reform, established by Constitutional Amendment 132/2023 and regulated by Complementary Law 214/2025, modernizes its fiscal structure but fails to establish a cohesive strategy for the intangible economy. Through a normative-legal and policy analysis, this article examines how the omission of an IP box regime and the introduction of new consumption tax burdens (Imposto sobre Bens e Serviços/Contribuição sobre Bens e Serviços) on IP commercialization affect the capture of IP value, location of intangibles and innovation incentives. Drawing on the economic framework for intangible capital, our analysis finds that the reform creates a severe misalignment between innovation policy and taxation. Sectoral asymmetries, such as preserving constitutional immunity for the book industry while increasing taxes for high-growth sectors like electronic games, weaken IP incentives and Brazil’s international competitiveness, exacerbating existing policy challenges for the intangible economy.

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & PracticeVol. 21(3)
Hospital Universitário da Universidade de São Paulo (BR), Bournemouth University (GB)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Corporate Taxation and Avoidance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Missed opportunities for innovation and intellectual property in Brazil’s tax reform — Rodrigo F. Silva, Suelen Carls · Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS