Resistance evolution in parasitoid biocontrol: understanding the rule, managing the exceptions

In contrast to chemical pest control, biological control (biocontrol) is generally considered evolutionarily stable, with pests rarely evolving resistance to agents such as parasitoid wasps. In 1997, Holt & Hochberg outlined five principles to explain this pattern. Here, we review post-1997 case studies where resistance has contributed to the breakdown of parasitoid-based biocontrol. We evaluate how these examples align with or challenge Holt & Hochberg's framework and propose updates to reflect new findings. While resistance remains rare, reported cases suggest that breakdowns are more likely when pests possess greater standing genetic variation than their parasitoid enemies. We argue that long-term stability depends not just on host constraints but also on the potential for parasitoid virulence to evolve. Finally, we offer practical recommendations for biocontrol practitioners and regulators to minimise the risk of resistance evolution in parasitoid-based systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Opinion in Insect Science
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cois.2026.101485
Primary Topic
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Resistance evolution in parasitoid biocontrol: understanding the rule, managing the exceptions

Rebecca A. Boulton, Marie Joy B. Beltran, Mia C McGowan, Chintamani Rose McKeon
Current Opinion in Insect Science
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
article

Resistance evolution in parasitoid biocontrol: understanding the rule, managing the exceptions

Rebecca A. Boulton, Marie Joy B. Beltran, Mia C McGowan, Chintamani Rose McKeon
article en

Abstract

In contrast to chemical pest control, biological control (biocontrol) is generally considered evolutionarily stable, with pests rarely evolving resistance to agents such as parasitoid wasps. In 1997, Holt & Hochberg outlined five principles to explain this pattern. Here, we review post-1997 case studies where resistance has contributed to the breakdown of parasitoid-based biocontrol. We evaluate how these examples align with or challenge Holt & Hochberg's framework and propose updates to reflect new findings. While resistance remains rare, reported cases suggest that breakdowns are more likely when pests possess greater standing genetic variation than their parasitoid enemies. We argue that long-term stability depends not just on host constraints but also on the potential for parasitoid virulence to evolve. Finally, we offer practical recommendations for biocontrol practitioners and regulators to minimise the risk of resistance evolution in parasitoid-based systems.

Current Opinion in Insect ScienceVol. 75
University of the Philippines Los Baños (PH), University of Stirling (GB), Scottish Agricultural Science Agency (GB), Scottish Government (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Resistance evolution in parasitoid biocontrol: understanding the rule, managing the exceptions — Rebecca A. Boulton, Marie Joy B. Beltran, et al. · Current Opinion in Insect Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS