Prediction Models in Non-Surgical Knee Osteoarthritis Management: A Scoping Review of the Current Evidence and Future Directions

OBJECTIVE: While precision is always the goal, non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is often constrained by heterogeneous patient presentations and practical barriers to personalization. Prediction models could enable precision care by forecasting treatment response, though their development requires robust, standardized datasets. While total knee arthroplasty (TKA) registries enable such modeling, conservative interventions suffer from heterogeneous documentation, limiting prediction model translation. This review maps existing literature on prediction models for non-surgical KOA management to evaluate current evidence and identify research gaps. DESIGN: Scoping review LITERATURE SEARCH: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, five electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to 12 December 2025. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Eligible studies included: (1) KOA populations, (2) non-surgical interventions, and (3) models predicting treatment outcomes. Two reviewers independently extracted data; discrepancies were resolved by a third. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data were charted by model type, input/output variables, timepoints, and performance. Narrative synthesis identified similarities, differences, and evidence gaps. RESULTS: Of 3307 records, 38 met inclusion, with one added through citation searching. Interventions included injectables (n = 13), exercise/physiotherapy (n = 11), pharmacological (n = 4), multimodal (n = 6), and others (n = 5). Logistic regression predominated, followed by machine-learning models. Predictors clustered into eight domains: demographic, comorbidities, physical health, clinical, mental health, procedural, radiological, and biomarkers. Discriminative ability was moderate (AUROC 0.66 – 0.88) but variably reported. CONCLUSION: Prediction models for conservative KOA care show potential but limited applicability due to inconsistent reporting and lack of external validation. Future work should test these models in real-world practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOSPT Methods
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2519/josptmethods.2026.0017
Primary Topic
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prediction Models in Non-Surgical Knee Osteoarthritis Management: A Scoping Review of the Current Evidence and Future Directions

Bryan Yijia Tan, Jodie A. Cochrane, Y. W. Ng, Oliver Roberts et al.
JOSPT Methods
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
article

Prediction Models in Non-Surgical Knee Osteoarthritis Management: A Scoping Review of the Current Evidence and Future Directions

Bryan Yijia Tan, Jodie A. Cochrane, Y. W. Ng, Oliver Roberts, Wesford Josh Goh, Yasmin Munro
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: While precision is always the goal, non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is often constrained by heterogeneous patient presentations and practical barriers to personalization. Prediction models could enable precision care by forecasting treatment response, though their development requires robust, standardized datasets. While total knee arthroplasty (TKA) registries enable such modeling, conservative interventions suffer from heterogeneous documentation, limiting prediction model translation. This review maps existing literature on prediction models for non-surgical KOA management to evaluate current evidence and identify research gaps. DESIGN: Scoping review LITERATURE SEARCH: Following PRISMA-ScR guidelines, five electronic databases were systematically searched from inception to 12 December 2025. STUDY SELECTION CRITERIA: Eligible studies included: (1) KOA populations, (2) non-surgical interventions, and (3) models predicting treatment outcomes. Two reviewers independently extracted data; discrepancies were resolved by a third. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data were charted by model type, input/output variables, timepoints, and performance. Narrative synthesis identified similarities, differences, and evidence gaps. RESULTS: Of 3307 records, 38 met inclusion, with one added through citation searching. Interventions included injectables (n = 13), exercise/physiotherapy (n = 11), pharmacological (n = 4), multimodal (n = 6), and others (n = 5). Logistic regression predominated, followed by machine-learning models. Predictors clustered into eight domains: demographic, comorbidities, physical health, clinical, mental health, procedural, radiological, and biomarkers. Discriminative ability was moderate (AUROC 0.66 – 0.88) but variably reported. CONCLUSION: Prediction models for conservative KOA care show potential but limited applicability due to inconsistent reporting and lack of external validation. Future work should test these models in real-world practice.

JOSPT Methods
National University of Singapore (SG), Nanyang Technological University (SG), Hunter Medical Research Institute (AU), Zero to Three (US), Woodlands Health Campus (SG), University of Newcastle Australia (AU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.