Synthetic data for pharmacogenetics: enabling scalable and secure research

Objective: This study evaluates the performance of 7 synthetic data generation (SDG) methods-synthpop, avatar, copula, copulagan, ctgan, tvae, and the large language models-based tabula-for supporting pharmacogenetics (PGx) research. Materials and methods: We used PGx profiles from 142 patients with adverse drug reactions or therapeutic failures, considering 2 scenarios: (1) a high-dimensional genotype dataset (104 variables) and (2) a phenotype dataset (24 variables). Models were assessed for (1) broad utility using propensity score mean squared error ( pMSE), (2) specific utility via weighted F1 score in a Train-Synthetic-Test-Real framework, and (3) privacy risk as ε-identifiability. Results: Copula and synthpop consistently achieved strong performance across both datasets, combining low ε-identifiability (0.25-0.35) with competitive utility. Deep learning models like tabula and tvae trained for 10 000 epochs achieved lower pMSE but had higher ε-identifiability (>0.4) and limited gains in predictive performance. Specific utility was only weakly correlated with broad utility, indicating that distributional fidelity does not ensure predictive relevance. Copula and synthpop often outperformed original data in weighted F1 scores, especially under noise or data imbalance. Discussion: While deep learning models can achieve high distributional fidelity ( pMSE), they often incur elevated ε-identifiability, raising privacy concerns. Traditional methods like copula and synthpop consistently offer robust utility and lower re-identification risk, particularly for high-dimensional data. Importantly, general utility does not predict specific utility ( F1 score), emphasizing the need for multimetric evaluation. Conclusion: No single SDG method dominated across all criteria. For privacy-sensitive PGx applications, classical methods such as copula and synthpop offer a reliable trade-off between utility and privacy, making them preferable for high-dimensional, limited-sample settings.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
BFH: ARBOR
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.24451/arbor.12688
Primary Topic
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Synthetic data for pharmacogenetics: enabling scalable and secure research

Samuel Allemann, Anna Bollinger, Marko Miletic, Murat Sariyar
BFH: ARBOR
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
article

Synthetic data for pharmacogenetics: enabling scalable and secure research

Samuel Allemann, Anna Bollinger, Marko Miletic, Murat Sariyar
article en

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluates the performance of 7 synthetic data generation (SDG) methods-synthpop, avatar, copula, copulagan, ctgan, tvae, and the large language models-based tabula-for supporting pharmacogenetics (PGx) research. Materials and methods: We used PGx profiles from 142 patients with adverse drug reactions or therapeutic failures, considering 2 scenarios: (1) a high-dimensional genotype dataset (104 variables) and (2) a phenotype dataset (24 variables). Models were assessed for (1) broad utility using propensity score mean squared error ( pMSE), (2) specific utility via weighted F1 score in a Train-Synthetic-Test-Real framework, and (3) privacy risk as ε-identifiability. Results: Copula and synthpop consistently achieved strong performance across both datasets, combining low ε-identifiability (0.25-0.35) with competitive utility. Deep learning models like tabula and tvae trained for 10 000 epochs achieved lower pMSE but had higher ε-identifiability (>0.4) and limited gains in predictive performance. Specific utility was only weakly correlated with broad utility, indicating that distributional fidelity does not ensure predictive relevance. Copula and synthpop often outperformed original data in weighted F1 scores, especially under noise or data imbalance. Discussion: While deep learning models can achieve high distributional fidelity ( pMSE), they often incur elevated ε-identifiability, raising privacy concerns. Traditional methods like copula and synthpop consistently offer robust utility and lower re-identification risk, particularly for high-dimensional data. Importantly, general utility does not predict specific utility ( F1 score), emphasizing the need for multimetric evaluation. Conclusion: No single SDG method dominated across all criteria. For privacy-sensitive PGx applications, classical methods such as copula and synthpop offer a reliable trade-off between utility and privacy, making them preferable for high-dimensional, limited-sample settings.

BFH: ARBOR
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.