Closing the border on Australia's domestic elephant ivory trade

Australia’s domestic market for elephant (Elephantidae ssp.) ivory remains active online, despite long-standing international controls and pledges to close domestic trade. We conducted snapshot monitoring of surface-web vendors (online auction houses and webstores with ‘buy-it-now’ payment options) and a survey of Facebook Marketplace posts made between January and June 2025, sampled every two weeks. We recorded 1,698 ivory listings from 70 Australia-based surface-web vendors with AUD $653,101 in auction sales, AUD $573,997 in webstore asking prices, and unsold auction lots carrying dealer estimates between AUD $127,400 and $189,765. Indications of compliance with international law were sparse (one stated an ivory policy; four mentioned the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora). Listing-level transparency was low, <1% listings provided documentation; 26% stated provenance, 9% provenience, and 62% an approximate age. Most listings were auctions (1,303 out of 1,698; 77%) and sell-through was high: 87% of auction lots sold. Sold versus passed lots did not differ significantly in provenance, provenience, or age disclosure. The market was dominated by small carved objects, netsuke (23.5%) and figurine/carvings (21.4%), with jewellery (12.1%), miniatures/relief art (10.0%) and tableware/utensils (7.5%) following. Price-calibration analyses (sold auctions) showed realised prices averaged c. 11.7% below dealers’ estimate midpoints. A total of 92 listings were recovered from Facebook Marketplace during five sampling sessions between March and May 2025. Collectively, a sizable, unregulated online market exists, moving a wide variety of primarily worked ivory items, including categories of item considered (and marketed) as cultural heritage for specific cultures, and items of potential historic significance. This points to an immediate need for mandatory documentation at point of listing and harmonised state-level regulation; although a comprehensive market closure would be highly preferred, and in-line with many other international jurisdictions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2026-09-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2026.112081
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Closing the border on Australia's domestic elephant ivory trade

Thomas Swearingen, Freyja Watters, Kellie Toole, Phillip Cassey et al.
Biological Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
article

Closing the border on Australia's domestic elephant ivory trade

Thomas Swearingen, Freyja Watters, Kellie Toole, Phillip Cassey, Damien Huffer
article en

Abstract

Australia’s domestic market for elephant (Elephantidae ssp.) ivory remains active online, despite long-standing international controls and pledges to close domestic trade. We conducted snapshot monitoring of surface-web vendors (online auction houses and webstores with ‘buy-it-now’ payment options) and a survey of Facebook Marketplace posts made between January and June 2025, sampled every two weeks. We recorded 1,698 ivory listings from 70 Australia-based surface-web vendors with AUD $653,101 in auction sales, AUD $573,997 in webstore asking prices, and unsold auction lots carrying dealer estimates between AUD $127,400 and $189,765. Indications of compliance with international law were sparse (one stated an ivory policy; four mentioned the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora). Listing-level transparency was low, <1% listings provided documentation; 26% stated provenance, 9% provenience, and 62% an approximate age. Most listings were auctions (1,303 out of 1,698; 77%) and sell-through was high: 87% of auction lots sold. Sold versus passed lots did not differ significantly in provenance, provenience, or age disclosure. The market was dominated by small carved objects, netsuke (23.5%) and figurine/carvings (21.4%), with jewellery (12.1%), miniatures/relief art (10.0%) and tableware/utensils (7.5%) following. Price-calibration analyses (sold auctions) showed realised prices averaged c. 11.7% below dealers’ estimate midpoints. A total of 92 listings were recovered from Facebook Marketplace during five sampling sessions between March and May 2025. Collectively, a sizable, unregulated online market exists, moving a wide variety of primarily worked ivory items, including categories of item considered (and marketed) as cultural heritage for specific cultures, and items of potential historic significance. This points to an immediate need for mandatory documentation at point of listing and harmonised state-level regulation; although a comprehensive market closure would be highly preferred, and in-line with many other international jurisdictions.

Biological ConservationVol. 323
The University of Adelaide (AU)
Directorate for Biological Sciences, Australian Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.