Effect of substrate dispersion method and particle size on in vitro digestibility, gas production kinetics and composition, and fermentation characteristics in different feed types

Our objective was to evaluate the influence of substrate dispersion method and particle size on in vitro digestibility, gas production kinetics and composition, and fermentation characteristics of different feed types. Alfalfa hay, tall fescue hay, ground corn, soybean meal, and a total mixed ration (TMR) were used as substrates. Treatments were designed according to a 2 × 2 × 5 factorial arrangement: two substrate dispersion methods (loose substrate and in filter bags), two particle sizes (1 mm and 2 mm), and five feeds. Filter bags decreased (P ≤ 0.001) digestibility and gas production compared with loose samples. Filter bags decreased digestibility and total gas production to a greater extent for forages, whereas the effects on concentrate feeds were less pronounced. Using filter bags decreased (P ≤ 0.015) both methane production and methane concentration in headspace gas across all feeds. Substrates incubated in filter bags showed a lower molar proportion of acetate and a greater molar proportion of propionate than loose substrates (P< 0.001). In general, energy-rich feeds incubated using filter bags had a decreased (P ≤ 0.036) acetate-to-propionate ratio, while substrate dispersion method did not influence (P ≥ 0.16) the VFA profile of protein-rich feeds. Incubating substrates in filter bags alters in vitro digestibility, gas production, and fermentation characteristics regardless of particle size. However, the magnitude of responses is greater for forage-based feeds than concentrate feeds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Animal Science
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2026.1749974
Primary Topic
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of substrate dispersion method and particle size on in vitro digestibility, gas production kinetics and composition, and fermentation characteristics in different feed types

Ronald J Trotta, Edenio Detmann, David L. Harmon, Ellem M. A. Matos et al.
Frontiers in Animal Science
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
article

Effect of substrate dispersion method and particle size on in vitro digestibility, gas production kinetics and composition, and fermentation characteristics in different feed types

Ronald J Trotta, Edenio Detmann, David L. Harmon, Ellem M. A. Matos, Luiz C. O. Sousa
article en

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate the influence of substrate dispersion method and particle size on in vitro digestibility, gas production kinetics and composition, and fermentation characteristics of different feed types. Alfalfa hay, tall fescue hay, ground corn, soybean meal, and a total mixed ration (TMR) were used as substrates. Treatments were designed according to a 2 × 2 × 5 factorial arrangement: two substrate dispersion methods (loose substrate and in filter bags), two particle sizes (1 mm and 2 mm), and five feeds. Filter bags decreased (P ≤ 0.001) digestibility and gas production compared with loose samples. Filter bags decreased digestibility and total gas production to a greater extent for forages, whereas the effects on concentrate feeds were less pronounced. Using filter bags decreased (P ≤ 0.015) both methane production and methane concentration in headspace gas across all feeds. Substrates incubated in filter bags showed a lower molar proportion of acetate and a greater molar proportion of propionate than loose substrates (P< 0.001). In general, energy-rich feeds incubated using filter bags had a decreased (P ≤ 0.036) acetate-to-propionate ratio, while substrate dispersion method did not influence (P ≥ 0.16) the VFA profile of protein-rich feeds. Incubating substrates in filter bags alters in vitro digestibility, gas production, and fermentation characteristics regardless of particle size. However, the magnitude of responses is greater for forage-based feeds than concentrate feeds.

Frontiers in Animal ScienceVol. 7
University of Kentucky (US), Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior, Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico, National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.