Why Are Accruals Associated with Analyst Forecast Errors?

ABSTRACT We exploit analysts’ forecasts of nonearnings measures and a granular accruals dataset to assess different explanations for why accruals are associated with analyst forecast errors. We evaluate four explanations: one accounting-based (the estimation error hypothesis) and three economics-based (related to investment activity, demand slowdowns, and product-market shocks). We find earnings forecast errors are stable over time, almost completely explained by revenue and cash flow errors, span multiple years, and are more pronounced in the presence of product-market shocks. Using a novel dataset of accruals not available in Compustat, we find no evidence that accruals with higher reporting discretion explain analyst forecast errors. Collectively, our evidence suggests that analysts’ forecast errors are best explained by a positive correlation between accruals and product-market shocks, indicating that these errors stem from the challenge of predicting how economic shocks affect future earnings rather than a failure to understand accounting principles or detect earnings management. Data Availability: The data used in this study are commercially available. JEL Classifications: G1; G14; M4; M41.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Financial Reporting
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2308/jfr-2025-005
Primary Topic
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why Are Accruals Associated with Analyst Forecast Errors?

Robert J. Resutek, Samuel O. Davidson
Journal of Financial Reporting
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
article

Why Are Accruals Associated with Analyst Forecast Errors?

Robert J. Resutek, Samuel O. Davidson
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT We exploit analysts’ forecasts of nonearnings measures and a granular accruals dataset to assess different explanations for why accruals are associated with analyst forecast errors. We evaluate four explanations: one accounting-based (the estimation error hypothesis) and three economics-based (related to investment activity, demand slowdowns, and product-market shocks). We find earnings forecast errors are stable over time, almost completely explained by revenue and cash flow errors, span multiple years, and are more pronounced in the presence of product-market shocks. Using a novel dataset of accruals not available in Compustat, we find no evidence that accruals with higher reporting discretion explain analyst forecast errors. Collectively, our evidence suggests that analysts’ forecast errors are best explained by a positive correlation between accruals and product-market shocks, indicating that these errors stem from the challenge of predicting how economic shocks affect future earnings rather than a failure to understand accounting principles or detect earnings management. Data Availability: The data used in this study are commercially available. JEL Classifications: G1; G14; M4; M41.

Journal of Financial Reporting
Baylor University (US)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.