Indeterminate-Grey Zone of HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Is Associated with a Higher Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Compared to HBeAg-Negative Chronic Infection—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Aim: The management of patients with chronic Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) HBeAg-negative infection in the indeterminate-grey zone (GZ) remains debatable. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare these patients with those with chronic HBV HBeAg-negative infection (inactive carriers; IC/HBeAg-negative), regarding the severity of liver inflammation and fibrosis and the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify all published studies comparing GZ/HBeAg-negative patients with IC/HBeAg-negative patients. Data on the severity of liver inflammation and fibrosis were extracted, and pooled relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The risk of HCC was estimated by pooled hazard ratios (HR). A random-effects meta-analysis model was performed using R v4.1.2. Results: Eleven studies were finally included. GZ/HBeAg-negative patients had significantly higher mean HBV-DNA and alanine transferase (ALT) levels, compared to their IC/HBeAg-negative counterparts (4089.9 ± 4840.5 vs. 215.9 ± 318.1 IU/mL; p = 0.0004, and 39.6 ± 26.9 IU/L and 20.1 ± 7.6 IU/L/; p < 0.0001, respectively). GZ/HBeAg-negative patients showed a trend towards a higher risk of significant liver inflammation (RR: 5.11; 95%CI: 0.68–38.33; p = 0.1), F2/F3 fibrosis (RR: 2.13; 95%CI: 0.89–5.1; p = 0.09), and cirrhosis (RR: 14.39; 95%CI: 0.5–417.08; p = 0.12), respectively, compared to IC/HBeAg-negative patients. After a median follow-up of 6.2 years, the former group demonstrated a significantly higher risk of developing HCC (HR: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.4–15.6; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: GZ/HBeAg-negative patients have a higher risk of developing HCC compared to IC/HBeAg-negative patients, which raises concerns about the potential need to initiate treatment in this patient group.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Livers
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/livers6010009
Primary Topic
Hepatitis B Virus Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Indeterminate-Grey Zone of HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Is Associated with a Higher Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Compared to HBeAg-Negative Chronic Infection—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Vasileios Lekakis, Kyriakos Kintzoglanakis, Dimitrios S. Karagiannakis, Rodanthi Syrigou et al.
Livers
Hepatitis B Virus Studies
article

Indeterminate-Grey Zone of HBeAg-Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Is Associated with a Higher Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Compared to HBeAg-Negative Chronic Infection—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Vasileios Lekakis, Kyriakos Kintzoglanakis, Dimitrios S. Karagiannakis, Rodanthi Syrigou, Dimitra Tiganiti
article en

Abstract

Background and Aim: The management of patients with chronic Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) HBeAg-negative infection in the indeterminate-grey zone (GZ) remains debatable. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare these patients with those with chronic HBV HBeAg-negative infection (inactive carriers; IC/HBeAg-negative), regarding the severity of liver inflammation and fibrosis and the risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: A literature search was conducted to identify all published studies comparing GZ/HBeAg-negative patients with IC/HBeAg-negative patients. Data on the severity of liver inflammation and fibrosis were extracted, and pooled relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. The risk of HCC was estimated by pooled hazard ratios (HR). A random-effects meta-analysis model was performed using R v4.1.2. Results: Eleven studies were finally included. GZ/HBeAg-negative patients had significantly higher mean HBV-DNA and alanine transferase (ALT) levels, compared to their IC/HBeAg-negative counterparts (4089.9 ± 4840.5 vs. 215.9 ± 318.1 IU/mL; p = 0.0004, and 39.6 ± 26.9 IU/L and 20.1 ± 7.6 IU/L/; p < 0.0001, respectively). GZ/HBeAg-negative patients showed a trend towards a higher risk of significant liver inflammation (RR: 5.11; 95%CI: 0.68–38.33; p = 0.1), F2/F3 fibrosis (RR: 2.13; 95%CI: 0.89–5.1; p = 0.09), and cirrhosis (RR: 14.39; 95%CI: 0.5–417.08; p = 0.12), respectively, compared to IC/HBeAg-negative patients. After a median follow-up of 6.2 years, the former group demonstrated a significantly higher risk of developing HCC (HR: 4.7; 95% CI: 1.4–15.6; p < 0.0001). Conclusions: GZ/HBeAg-negative patients have a higher risk of developing HCC compared to IC/HBeAg-negative patients, which raises concerns about the potential need to initiate treatment in this patient group.

LiversVol. 6(1)
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR), Alexandra Hospital (GR), Laiko General Hospital of Athens (GR), Thebes Academy (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Hepatitis B Virus Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.