Clinical use and reporting of neurofilament quantification in neurological disorders: A global overview

Introduction: Neurofilament light chain (NfL) quantification aids in diagnosing and predicting neurological disorders, but clinical and laboratory practices vary across centers. Differences in result interpretation and reporting further challenge test commutability. This study aimed to review the global analytical and post-analytical methods used for NfL measurement in routine clinical practice across different contexts. Methods: We established an international working group (WG) and distributed a survey to its members to gather information on context of use (COU), (pre) analytical methods, cutoff usage, as well as the interpretation and reporting of NfL measurements. Results: Among the centers, 63% measured NfL in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 87% in blood, and 53% in both. COU was widespread, with 50% defining pathological cutoffs based on publications and 42% considering age. Reporting was primarily done through numeric results (95%). Discussion: Harmonizing cutoffs, reporting, and interpretation across various clinical contexts will facilitate the incorporation of this biomarker into routine clinical practice. Highlights: Unique international overview of current analytical and post-analytical methods for neurofilament light chain (NfL) measurement in routine clinical practice. Tailored sheets for each neurological application. Strategies to harmonize cutoffs, reporting, and interpretation of NfL's measurement.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-06-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-284539
Primary Topic
Skin and Cellular Biology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical use and reporting of neurofilament quantification in neurological disorders: A global overview

Aurélie Ladang, Dorte Aalund Olsen, Melanie Hart, Alicia Algeciras‐Schimnich et al.
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Skin and Cellular Biology Research
article

Clinical use and reporting of neurofilament quantification in neurological disorders: A global overview

Aurélie Ladang, Dorte Aalund Olsen, Melanie Hart, Alicia Algeciras‐Schimnich, Maria Bjerke, Constance Delaby, Tiziana Casoli, Inês Baldeiras, Juan M. Fortea, A. Bedel, Mark W. Head, I. Quadrio, Jose Martinez‐Yriarte, Xavier Ayrignac, Gustavo A A Santos, Chiara Zecca, Edith Bigot‐Corbel, et al., Elodie Bouaziz‐Amar, Erdinc Dursun, Alberto Lleo, Jessica Cusato, Kaj Blennow, Peter Körtvelyessy, Tinatin Chabrashvili, Hayrettin Tumani, Miles D. Chapman, Mercedes Carretero Perez, Wyllians Vendramini Borelli, Giancarlo Logroscino
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Neurofilament light chain (NfL) quantification aids in diagnosing and predicting neurological disorders, but clinical and laboratory practices vary across centers. Differences in result interpretation and reporting further challenge test commutability. This study aimed to review the global analytical and post-analytical methods used for NfL measurement in routine clinical practice across different contexts. Methods: We established an international working group (WG) and distributed a survey to its members to gather information on context of use (COU), (pre) analytical methods, cutoff usage, as well as the interpretation and reporting of NfL measurements. Results: Among the centers, 63% measured NfL in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), 87% in blood, and 53% in both. COU was widespread, with 50% defining pathological cutoffs based on publications and 42% considering age. Reporting was primarily done through numeric results (95%). Discussion: Harmonizing cutoffs, reporting, and interpretation across various clinical contexts will facilitate the incorporation of this biomarker into routine clinical practice. Highlights: Unique international overview of current analytical and post-analytical methods for neurofilament light chain (NfL) measurement in routine clinical practice. Tailored sheets for each neurological application. Strategies to harmonize cutoffs, reporting, and interpretation of NfL's measurement.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Skin and Cellular Biology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.