Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: Safety Under an Immunosuppression-Preserving Strategy

BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used as first-line combination therapies for many cancers. However, ICIs are associated with an increased risk of graft rejection in patients requiring liver transplants, and the tumor response rate has yet to be determined. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study included liver transplant recipients who received ICIs for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. During ICI therapy, baseline immunosuppressant doses were maintained, with low-dose steroid treatments added when clinically indicated. RESULTS A total of 25 patients were included, with 12 receiving ICIs as first-line therapy, and 13 as second-line therapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.93 months (95% CI, 2.33-28.63) and 7.20 months (3.80-32.47), respectively. One patient (4.0%) developed grade 2 hepatitis, and 2 (8%) experienced grade 3 gastrointestinal bleeding. Concurrent steroid use was associated with fewer immune-related adverse events (0% vs 30%, P=0.052) but showed a trend toward shorter PFS (HR=2.30, P=0.071). Two patients (8%) achieved complete remission, and 4 (16%) maintained disease control for more than 1 year. In multivariable analysis, recurrence within 1 year after transplantation was the only significant prognostic factor for PFS (HR=2.98, P=0.043). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that ICIs can be administered after liver transplantation without reducing baseline immunosuppressant doses, potentially minimizing the risk of fatal allograft rejection while still allowing antitumor activity. These results should be interpreted cautiously, and larger studies are needed to define the safe and appropriate use of ICIs in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Transplantation
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12659/aot.952135
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: Safety Under an Immunosuppression-Preserving Strategy

Hung-Wei Wang, Sheng-Hsien Chen, Horng-Ren Yang, Wei-Fan Hsu et al.
Annals of Transplantation
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: Safety Under an Immunosuppression-Preserving Strategy

Hung-Wei Wang, Sheng-Hsien Chen, Horng-Ren Yang, Wei-Fan Hsu, Shih-Chao Hsu, Hsueh-Chou Lai, Te-Hong Chen, Chun-Chieh Yeh, Long-Bin Jeng
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used as first-line combination therapies for many cancers. However, ICIs are associated with an increased risk of graft rejection in patients requiring liver transplants, and the tumor response rate has yet to be determined. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective study included liver transplant recipients who received ICIs for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma. During ICI therapy, baseline immunosuppressant doses were maintained, with low-dose steroid treatments added when clinically indicated. RESULTS A total of 25 patients were included, with 12 receiving ICIs as first-line therapy, and 13 as second-line therapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 4.93 months (95% CI, 2.33-28.63) and 7.20 months (3.80-32.47), respectively. One patient (4.0%) developed grade 2 hepatitis, and 2 (8%) experienced grade 3 gastrointestinal bleeding. Concurrent steroid use was associated with fewer immune-related adverse events (0% vs 30%, P=0.052) but showed a trend toward shorter PFS (HR=2.30, P=0.071). Two patients (8%) achieved complete remission, and 4 (16%) maintained disease control for more than 1 year. In multivariable analysis, recurrence within 1 year after transplantation was the only significant prognostic factor for PFS (HR=2.98, P=0.043). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that ICIs can be administered after liver transplantation without reducing baseline immunosuppressant doses, potentially minimizing the risk of fatal allograft rejection while still allowing antitumor activity. These results should be interpreted cautiously, and larger studies are needed to define the safe and appropriate use of ICIs in this population.

Annals of TransplantationVol. 31
China Medical University (TW), China Medical University Hospital (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.