An in-vitro study on factors influencing the accuracy of current intraoral scanners

Intraoral scanning devices are an essential part of many digital pathways in dentistry. The aim of this first factorial comparative in-vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different jaw model configurations (model types: upper jaw [upper], upper jaw with palate [upper-pal], lower jaw [lower]) and examiners on trueness and precision of digital full-arch impressions across seven intraoral scanners. Reference models were scanned with Emerald Green [EME]; iTero 5D [ITE]; Medit i900 [MED]; Primescan [PRI]; Primescan2 [PS2]; Aoralscan 3 [SHI]; Trios 5 [TR5]. Each model type was scanned ten times (n = 10) per device, divided between two examiners with different experience levels. Trueness and precision were calculated using the (90_10)/2-percentile. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with model type and examiner as fixed effects and scanning device as a random effect. The trueness values ranged from PRI (29.0 ± 3.7 μm, [upper-pal]) to EME (94.9 ± 18.5 μm, [lower]). Examiner and model type had no significant effect on trueness. For precision, the model type [upper-pal] showed a significant positive effect (p < 0.001), factor examiner had a significant effect (p = 0.04). The model type and examiner experience can influence the accuracy of digital impressions; however, the values observed were within clinically acceptable thresholds (< 100 μm). Including the palate in upper jaw scans can improve accuracy for certain intraoral scanners. Optimizing scanning strategies, exercising and considering jaw anatomy-especially the inclusion of the palate-may enhance scanners' accuracy.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Published
2025-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-284563
Primary Topic
Dental materials and restorations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An in-vitro study on factors influencing the accuracy of current intraoral scanners

Jenny Buhl, Albert Mehl, Andreas Ender
Universität Zürich, ZORA
Dental materials and restorations
article

An in-vitro study on factors influencing the accuracy of current intraoral scanners

Jenny Buhl, Albert Mehl, Andreas Ender
article en

Abstract

Intraoral scanning devices are an essential part of many digital pathways in dentistry. The aim of this first factorial comparative in-vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different jaw model configurations (model types: upper jaw [upper], upper jaw with palate [upper-pal], lower jaw [lower]) and examiners on trueness and precision of digital full-arch impressions across seven intraoral scanners. Reference models were scanned with Emerald Green [EME]; iTero 5D [ITE]; Medit i900 [MED]; Primescan [PRI]; Primescan2 [PS2]; Aoralscan 3 [SHI]; Trios 5 [TR5]. Each model type was scanned ten times (n = 10) per device, divided between two examiners with different experience levels. Trueness and precision were calculated using the (90_10)/2-percentile. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with model type and examiner as fixed effects and scanning device as a random effect. The trueness values ranged from PRI (29.0 ± 3.7 μm, [upper-pal]) to EME (94.9 ± 18.5 μm, [lower]). Examiner and model type had no significant effect on trueness. For precision, the model type [upper-pal] showed a significant positive effect (p < 0.001), factor examiner had a significant effect (p = 0.04). The model type and examiner experience can influence the accuracy of digital impressions; however, the values observed were within clinically acceptable thresholds (< 100 μm). Including the palate in upper jaw scans can improve accuracy for certain intraoral scanners. Optimizing scanning strategies, exercising and considering jaw anatomy-especially the inclusion of the palate-may enhance scanners' accuracy.

Universität Zürich, ZORA
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Dental materials and restorations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.