Pore-micro fracture structure, porosity and gas- bearing property of deep shale under lithofacies-formation pressure coupling

Formation pressure-lithofacies type are the most critical factors influencing micro pore structure and porosity in shale reservoir. However, how these two factors jointly affect shale gas accumulation remains unclear. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), on-site desorption and low-temperature N<sub>2</sub> adsorption (LTNA) are integrated to analyze coupling effects of pressure variation and lithofacies on reservoir quality and gas-bearing characteristics of deep-buried shale. Three lithofacies are identified in Longmaxi deep-buried shale: siliceous lithofacies (S), argillaceous lithofacies (CM) and mixed lithofacies (M). Pores with pore size < 4 nm are the main contributors to the specific surface area (SSA), and pores between 4 nm and 30 nm are the main contributors to the pore volume (PV). Pressure variations directly affect the size and number of organic matter pores but have no impact on intraparticle pores. The variability in interparticle pores indicates that the S lithofacies has a stronger resistance to compaction compared to the M lithofacies. Porosity and micro structure of deep-buried shale reservoir are influenced by lithofacies type, burial depth and pressure variation. Organic-rich S shale and organic-poor S shale demonstrate good reservoir properties under over-pressure and well-preserved conditions, with organic-rich S shale having the strongest resistance to compaction. Organic and inorganic pores are largely lost during compaction of organic-rich M shale. CM lithofacies also has a poor material foundation and the weakest resistance to compaction, making it difficult to preserve original porosity and pore structure during compaction. The decrease in formation pressure results in macropores making almost no contribution to pore volume, while the contribution of mesopores is further enhanced. As the formation pressure decreases, the contribution of micropores to pore volume is gradually increased. As shale porosity decreases, porosity associated with macro pores declines first, followed by that associated with mesopores. Free-gas content in the CM and M lithofacies declines rapidly as porosity decreases. Both adsorbed and free gas decrease sharply as porosity is lost.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38352-7
Primary Topic
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pore-micro fracture structure, porosity and gas- bearing property of deep shale under lithofacies-formation pressure coupling

L Zhang, J. Li, Yong Zhang, Yaohui Yan et al.
Scientific Reports
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
article

Pore-micro fracture structure, porosity and gas- bearing property of deep shale under lithofacies-formation pressure coupling

L Zhang, J. Li, Yong Zhang, Yaohui Yan, Hao Zhang
article en

Abstract

Formation pressure-lithofacies type are the most critical factors influencing micro pore structure and porosity in shale reservoir. However, how these two factors jointly affect shale gas accumulation remains unclear. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM), X-ray diffraction (XRD), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), on-site desorption and low-temperature N<sub>2</sub> adsorption (LTNA) are integrated to analyze coupling effects of pressure variation and lithofacies on reservoir quality and gas-bearing characteristics of deep-buried shale. Three lithofacies are identified in Longmaxi deep-buried shale: siliceous lithofacies (S), argillaceous lithofacies (CM) and mixed lithofacies (M). Pores with pore size < 4 nm are the main contributors to the specific surface area (SSA), and pores between 4 nm and 30 nm are the main contributors to the pore volume (PV). Pressure variations directly affect the size and number of organic matter pores but have no impact on intraparticle pores. The variability in interparticle pores indicates that the S lithofacies has a stronger resistance to compaction compared to the M lithofacies. Porosity and micro structure of deep-buried shale reservoir are influenced by lithofacies type, burial depth and pressure variation. Organic-rich S shale and organic-poor S shale demonstrate good reservoir properties under over-pressure and well-preserved conditions, with organic-rich S shale having the strongest resistance to compaction. Organic and inorganic pores are largely lost during compaction of organic-rich M shale. CM lithofacies also has a poor material foundation and the weakest resistance to compaction, making it difficult to preserve original porosity and pore structure during compaction. The decrease in formation pressure results in macropores making almost no contribution to pore volume, while the contribution of mesopores is further enhanced. As the formation pressure decreases, the contribution of micropores to pore volume is gradually increased. As shale porosity decreases, porosity associated with macro pores declines first, followed by that associated with mesopores. Free-gas content in the CM and M lithofacies declines rapidly as porosity decreases. Both adsorbed and free gas decrease sharply as porosity is lost.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Chengdu University of Technology (CN), China National Petroleum Corporation (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.