What might we learn about autobiographical narrative processing from Artificial Intelligence?

Human beings are innately storytellers. Large Language Model AI algorithms (LLMs) like ChatGPT are not. But what ChatGPT produces, when instructed to generate or interpret a narrative, is powerful and can provide insight into human narrative processing, because it is trained to produce narratives from human sources. Our paper explores these ideas. In the first section we review key concepts from narrative identity theory and research, including a recent study from our multi-institution collaboration exploring similarities and differences in human and AI narrative processing. The current study extends this work by exploring people’s perceptions of ChatGPT interpretations of human personal narratives. Across these studies we find that people are adept at differentiating between human and ChatGPT-generated self-defining memory narratives and this may be because ChatGPT relies on redemptive tone and structure, a culturally dominant master narrative, in ways that seemed inauthentic and uncanny to human participants. Discussion focuses on key questions this work raises for research on narrative meaning-making, authenticity through narrative identity, and therapeutic uses of AI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-06426-y
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What might we learn about autobiographical narrative processing from Artificial Intelligence?

Jack J. Bauer, Azriel Grysman, Jefferson A. Singer, Cade D. Mansfield et al.
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

What might we learn about autobiographical narrative processing from Artificial Intelligence?

Jack J. Bauer, Azriel Grysman, Jefferson A. Singer, Cade D. Mansfield, Robyn Fivush, Jordan Booker
article en

Abstract

Human beings are innately storytellers. Large Language Model AI algorithms (LLMs) like ChatGPT are not. But what ChatGPT produces, when instructed to generate or interpret a narrative, is powerful and can provide insight into human narrative processing, because it is trained to produce narratives from human sources. Our paper explores these ideas. In the first section we review key concepts from narrative identity theory and research, including a recent study from our multi-institution collaboration exploring similarities and differences in human and AI narrative processing. The current study extends this work by exploring people’s perceptions of ChatGPT interpretations of human personal narratives. Across these studies we find that people are adept at differentiating between human and ChatGPT-generated self-defining memory narratives and this may be because ChatGPT relies on redemptive tone and structure, a culturally dominant master narrative, in ways that seemed inauthentic and uncanny to human participants. Discussion focuses on key questions this work raises for research on narrative meaning-making, authenticity through narrative identity, and therapeutic uses of AI.

Humanities and Social Sciences CommunicationsVol. 13(1)
Dickinson College (US), University of Dayton (US), Emory University (US), Franklin & Marshall College (US), Connecticut College (US), University of Missouri (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.