Comparative evaluation of the bone remodeling of implant with convergent neck walls positioned at the crestal and subcrestal levels
The search for possible radiographic differences between the crestal and subcrestal positioning of the convergent neck implants, concludes by observing the lack of a statistically significant result but with important insights into the positioning method at level B. The average bone loss is favorable for crestal positioning (-0.57 mm) compared to subcrestal (-0.683 mm).
Authors
- Ayt Alla Bader (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-6920)
- Gianluca Porcaro
- Fabrizio CARINI
- Daniele Viscardi
- Fabio Carini
Institutions
- University of Verona (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo (IT)
- Fondazione Lanza (IT)
- University of Milano-Bicocca (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Minerva Dental and Oral Science
- Published
- 2026-02-01
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.23736/s2724-6329.25.05147-2
- Primary Topic
- Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00