Variation Among Grain Elevator Testing Sites and Analytical Cross-Reactivity of Commercial Immunoassay Kits for Deoxynivalenol Detection in Maize

Commercial immunoassay-based test kits are widely used for rapid screening of deoxynivalenol (DON) in maize; however, inconsistent results are frequently observed under commercial testing conditions. This study evaluated two distinct contributors to such variability: analytical cross-reactivity of commercial DON immunoassays and between-site variability arising from routine grain elevator testing practices. Under controlled laboratory conditions, all kits accurately measured DON but responded differently to co-occurring DON derivatives. In naturally contaminated maize, immunoassay results reflected the combined presence of DON and co-occurring derivatives, consistent with differences in antibody specificity. An interlaboratory comparison involving multiple grain elevators analyzing identical blinded samples demonstrated substantial between-site variability in reported DON concentrations, with about 16% of results deviating by more than ±20% from the LC-MS/MS reference value. Collectively, these findings show that inconsistent DON test outcomes arise from the combined effects of antibody cross-reactivity and site-specific testing variability, rather than from any unreliability of the analytical methods themselves. This finding highlights the importance of interpreting rapid DON measurements considering these factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxins
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins18020081
Primary Topic
Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Variation Among Grain Elevator Testing Sites and Analytical Cross-Reactivity of Commercial Immunoassay Kits for Deoxynivalenol Detection in Maize

David C. Hooker, Victor Limay‐Rios, A. W. Schaafsma, J. David Miller et al.
Toxins
Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
article

Variation Among Grain Elevator Testing Sites and Analytical Cross-Reactivity of Commercial Immunoassay Kits for Deoxynivalenol Detection in Maize

David C. Hooker, Victor Limay‐Rios, A. W. Schaafsma, J. David Miller, Beatrice Gedion
article en

Abstract

Commercial immunoassay-based test kits are widely used for rapid screening of deoxynivalenol (DON) in maize; however, inconsistent results are frequently observed under commercial testing conditions. This study evaluated two distinct contributors to such variability: analytical cross-reactivity of commercial DON immunoassays and between-site variability arising from routine grain elevator testing practices. Under controlled laboratory conditions, all kits accurately measured DON but responded differently to co-occurring DON derivatives. In naturally contaminated maize, immunoassay results reflected the combined presence of DON and co-occurring derivatives, consistent with differences in antibody specificity. An interlaboratory comparison involving multiple grain elevators analyzing identical blinded samples demonstrated substantial between-site variability in reported DON concentrations, with about 16% of results deviating by more than ±20% from the LC-MS/MS reference value. Collectively, these findings show that inconsistent DON test outcomes arise from the combined effects of antibody cross-reactivity and site-specific testing variability, rather than from any unreliability of the analytical methods themselves. This finding highlights the importance of interpreting rapid DON measurements considering these factors.

ToxinsVol. 18(2)
Carleton University (CA), University of Guelph (CA)
Grain Farmers of Ontario, Ontario Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Mycotoxins in Agriculture and Food
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.