Non-contact optical blood pressure biometry using AI-based analysis of non-mydriatic fundus imaging

Background/Introduction This study was developed to determine whether a machine learning model could be developed to assess blood pressure with accuracy comparable to arm cuff measurements. Methods A deep learning model was developed based on the UK Biobank dataset and was trained to detect both systolic and diastolic pressure. The hypothesis was formulated after data collection and before the development of the model. A comparison was conducted between arm cuff measurements, as ground truth and results from the model, using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error and coefficient of determination (R 2 ). Results Systolic pressure was measured with 9.81 MAE, 165.13 mean squared error and 0.36 R 2 . Diastolic pressure was measured with 6.00 MAE, 58.21 and 0.30 R 2 . Conclusions This model improves on existing research and shows errors comparable to the variability of hand cuff measurements. The use of fundus images to assess blood pressure may be more indicative of long-term hypertension. Additional trials in clinical settings may be necessary, as well as additional prospective studies to validate results.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Innovations
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjinnov-2025-001422
Primary Topic
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-contact optical blood pressure biometry using AI-based analysis of non-mydriatic fundus imaging

Danny Margalit, Rachelle Aviv, Dolev Dollberg, Zack Dvey-Aharon et al.
BMJ Innovations
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
article

Non-contact optical blood pressure biometry using AI-based analysis of non-mydriatic fundus imaging

Danny Margalit, Rachelle Aviv, Dolev Dollberg, Zack Dvey-Aharon, Idan Bressler, Tsontcho Sean Ianchulev, Alon Harris, Brent Siesky
article en

Abstract

Background/Introduction This study was developed to determine whether a machine learning model could be developed to assess blood pressure with accuracy comparable to arm cuff measurements. Methods A deep learning model was developed based on the UK Biobank dataset and was trained to detect both systolic and diastolic pressure. The hypothesis was formulated after data collection and before the development of the model. A comparison was conducted between arm cuff measurements, as ground truth and results from the model, using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error and coefficient of determination (R 2 ). Results Systolic pressure was measured with 9.81 MAE, 165.13 mean squared error and 0.36 R 2 . Diastolic pressure was measured with 6.00 MAE, 58.21 and 0.30 R 2 . Conclusions This model improves on existing research and shows errors comparable to the variability of hand cuff measurements. The use of fundus images to assess blood pressure may be more indicative of long-term hypertension. Additional trials in clinical settings may be necessary, as well as additional prospective studies to validate results.

BMJ Innovations
Tel Aviv University (IL), Rabin Medical Center (IL), Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yafo (IL), Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Retinal Imaging and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Non-contact optical blood pressure biometry using AI-based analysis of non-mydriatic fundus imaging — Danny Margalit, Rachelle Aviv, et al. · BMJ Innovations (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS