Validation of an AI model for pediatric myelin maturation age assessment and benefits for junior radiologists

Artificial intelligence (AI) demonstrates potential for estimating myelin maturation age from pediatric brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. However, its generalizability across diverse clinical settings and performance in infants with delayed myelination remain unvalidated. Additionally, the utility of such AI models in assisting radiologist interpretation is unclear. This study aimed to validate an AI model for myelin maturation age prediction in our institution and compare the assessment performance of junior radiologists with and without AI assistance. A pretrained convolutional-neural-network (CNN) model was tested on 817 brain MRI scans (0–12 months): 768 with normal myelination and 49 with documented delay. The ground truth of myelin-maturation age was set by consensus of two experienced pediatric neuroradiologists. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and Spearman’s correlation coefficient between ground-truth and AI-predicted age. For the utility study, three junior radiologists independently reviewed 147 consecutive cases in a crossover design (AI-assisted vs. unassisted), separated by a 4-week washout. MAE and reading time were compared with paired t-tests. The AI model achieved an MAE of 1.3 months (95%CI: 1.2, 1.4), demonstrating a strong positive correlation (Spearman’s r = 0.933, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in MAE between the delayed myelination group (1.3 months, 95% CI: 1.0, 1.6) and the normal myelination group (1.3 months, 95% CI: 1.2, 1.4) (P = 0.978). Correlation strength differed significantly between groups (P < 0.001). When using AI assistance, junior radiologists significantly reduced their MAE from a baseline range of 0.5–0.8 months to 0.2 months (P < 0.001 for each radiologist) and decreased reading times from 53.8 to 65.2 s to 48.6–56.8 s (P < 0.001). The AI model was successfully validated at our institution, demonstrating accurate prediction of myelin maturation age, even in infants with delayed myelination. Furthermore, providing AI predictions significantly enhanced both the accuracy and efficiency of myelin maturation age assessments performed by junior radiologists. This supports the potential clinical utility of AI assistance in pediatric neuroimaging workflows.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Imaging
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-026-02198-2
Primary Topic
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validation of an AI model for pediatric myelin maturation age assessment and benefits for junior radiologists

Xincheng Li, Zuqiang Xi, Q. Zou, Kexin Wang et al.
BMC Medical Imaging
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
article

Validation of an AI model for pediatric myelin maturation age assessment and benefits for junior radiologists

Xincheng Li, Zuqiang Xi, Q. Zou, Kexin Wang, Zijian Cai, Yaofeng Zhang, Xiaoying Wang
article en

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) demonstrates potential for estimating myelin maturation age from pediatric brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. However, its generalizability across diverse clinical settings and performance in infants with delayed myelination remain unvalidated. Additionally, the utility of such AI models in assisting radiologist interpretation is unclear. This study aimed to validate an AI model for myelin maturation age prediction in our institution and compare the assessment performance of junior radiologists with and without AI assistance. A pretrained convolutional-neural-network (CNN) model was tested on 817 brain MRI scans (0–12 months): 768 with normal myelination and 49 with documented delay. The ground truth of myelin-maturation age was set by consensus of two experienced pediatric neuroradiologists. Model performance was evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE) and Spearman’s correlation coefficient between ground-truth and AI-predicted age. For the utility study, three junior radiologists independently reviewed 147 consecutive cases in a crossover design (AI-assisted vs. unassisted), separated by a 4-week washout. MAE and reading time were compared with paired t-tests. The AI model achieved an MAE of 1.3 months (95%CI: 1.2, 1.4), demonstrating a strong positive correlation (Spearman’s r = 0.933, P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in MAE between the delayed myelination group (1.3 months, 95% CI: 1.0, 1.6) and the normal myelination group (1.3 months, 95% CI: 1.2, 1.4) (P = 0.978). Correlation strength differed significantly between groups (P < 0.001). When using AI assistance, junior radiologists significantly reduced their MAE from a baseline range of 0.5–0.8 months to 0.2 months (P < 0.001 for each radiologist) and decreased reading times from 53.8 to 65.2 s to 48.6–56.8 s (P < 0.001). The AI model was successfully validated at our institution, demonstrating accurate prediction of myelin maturation age, even in infants with delayed myelination. Furthermore, providing AI predictions significantly enhanced both the accuracy and efficiency of myelin maturation age assessments performed by junior radiologists. This supports the potential clinical utility of AI assistance in pediatric neuroimaging workflows.

BMC Medical ImagingVol. 26(1)
Peking University (CN), Peking University First Hospital (CN), Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital (CN)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.