The Effect of Evaluating Others’ Decision-Making Results on Subsequent Decision-Making

Effective decision-making is crucial for both individuals and organizations. To improve individual's decision-making, traditional methods involve practicing and providing feedback. While these methods are effective, we propose evaluating others' decision-making as a more efficient training approach, and in this study, we explore its potential through two experiments. In Experiment 1,109 participants completed an initial task and then took part in training under two conditions: evaluating others' decision-making results as correct or incorrect, and practicing decision-making with feedback. After the training, all participants completed a final decision-making task. The results indicated that evaluating others' decision-making results significantly enhanced accuracy in the final task compared to practicing with feedback. In Experiment 2 with 110 participants, we replicated the findings using a different decision-making task. Our results suggest that evaluating others' decision-making results can improve the accuracy of subsequent decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Psychology
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2026.2625945
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Effect of Evaluating Others’ Decision-Making Results on Subsequent Decision-Making

Jooyong Park
The Journal of Psychology
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

The Effect of Evaluating Others’ Decision-Making Results on Subsequent Decision-Making

Jooyong Park
article en

Abstract

Effective decision-making is crucial for both individuals and organizations. To improve individual's decision-making, traditional methods involve practicing and providing feedback. While these methods are effective, we propose evaluating others' decision-making as a more efficient training approach, and in this study, we explore its potential through two experiments. In Experiment 1,109 participants completed an initial task and then took part in training under two conditions: evaluating others' decision-making results as correct or incorrect, and practicing decision-making with feedback. After the training, all participants completed a final decision-making task. The results indicated that evaluating others' decision-making results significantly enhanced accuracy in the final task compared to practicing with feedback. In Experiment 2 with 110 participants, we replicated the findings using a different decision-making task. Our results suggest that evaluating others' decision-making results can improve the accuracy of subsequent decision-making.

The Journal of Psychology
Seoul National University (KR)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.