Fuel–gas mixing characteristics in premixing chamber for an air-assisted fuel injector

Air-assisted fuel injection (AAFI) effectively atomizes high-viscosity fuels like kerosene and diesel, yet the fuel–gas mixing process inside the premixing chamber is not fully understood. In this study, a full-scale transparent premixing chamber model combined with high-speed imaging techniques was employed to systematically investigate the influencing factors and mechanisms of fuel–gas mixing. The effects of fuel–gas pressure drop, fuel injection pressure, and fuel injection width on the macroscopic premixing process, two-phase flow evolution, fuel penetration distance, and fuel projection area were analyzed. Results show that the fuel–gas mixing process can be divided into an injection stage and a post-injection mixing stage, during which five distinct two-phase flow patterns were identified: falling film flow, slug flow, wavy flow, annular flow with ligaments, and mist flow, ranked in ascending order of mixing uniformity. The fuel–gas pressure drop was found to be the dominant factor influencing premixing, enhancing breakup and mixing during injection but causing fuel accumulation at the chamber bottom during prolonged mixing. Injection width primarily affects mixing by altering the falling film flow region, while the effect of injection pressure on mixing uniformity is negligible. Furthermore, an increase in the pressure drop led to the observation of three typical mixing modes: stratified-flow, transitional-flow, and dispersed-flow mixing. Overall, excessive fuel–gas pressure drop and injection width both lead to fuel accumulation and reduced mixing uniformity. These findings highlight the necessity of optimizing the interplay between fuel–gas pressure drop, injection width, and premixing time to achieve efficient fuel–gas mixing in practical AAFI applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Physics of Fluids
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0310608
Primary Topic
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fuel–gas mixing characteristics in premixing chamber for an air-assisted fuel injector

Jilin Lei, Y. C. Liu, Guangyi Xie, Dongfang Wang et al.
Physics of Fluids
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
article

Fuel–gas mixing characteristics in premixing chamber for an air-assisted fuel injector

Jilin Lei, Y. C. Liu, Guangyi Xie, Dongfang Wang, Yafei Yuan
article en

Abstract

Air-assisted fuel injection (AAFI) effectively atomizes high-viscosity fuels like kerosene and diesel, yet the fuel–gas mixing process inside the premixing chamber is not fully understood. In this study, a full-scale transparent premixing chamber model combined with high-speed imaging techniques was employed to systematically investigate the influencing factors and mechanisms of fuel–gas mixing. The effects of fuel–gas pressure drop, fuel injection pressure, and fuel injection width on the macroscopic premixing process, two-phase flow evolution, fuel penetration distance, and fuel projection area were analyzed. Results show that the fuel–gas mixing process can be divided into an injection stage and a post-injection mixing stage, during which five distinct two-phase flow patterns were identified: falling film flow, slug flow, wavy flow, annular flow with ligaments, and mist flow, ranked in ascending order of mixing uniformity. The fuel–gas pressure drop was found to be the dominant factor influencing premixing, enhancing breakup and mixing during injection but causing fuel accumulation at the chamber bottom during prolonged mixing. Injection width primarily affects mixing by altering the falling film flow region, while the effect of injection pressure on mixing uniformity is negligible. Furthermore, an increase in the pressure drop led to the observation of three typical mixing modes: stratified-flow, transitional-flow, and dispersed-flow mixing. Overall, excessive fuel–gas pressure drop and injection width both lead to fuel accumulation and reduced mixing uniformity. These findings highlight the necessity of optimizing the interplay between fuel–gas pressure drop, injection width, and premixing time to achieve efficient fuel–gas mixing in practical AAFI applications.

Physics of FluidsVol. 38(2)
Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN), WuXi AppTec (China) (CN), Yunnan Vocational College of Mechanical and Electrical Technology (CN), Yunnan Provincial Department of Transportation (CN), Wuxi Institute of Technology (CN)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Advanced Combustion Engine Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.