Assessment of PlanetScope Spectral Data for Estimation of Peanut Leaf Area Index Using Machine Learning and Statistical Methods

Leaf area index (LAI) is a key indicator of crop growth and development and is widely used in both agricultural research and precision farming applications. PlanetScope imagery is generally used for monitoring crop growth due to its high revisit frequency, broad spatial coverage, and cost-effective access to consistent high-resolution multispectral data. Therefore, we developed regression models to estimate peanut LAI, combining PlanetScope spectral bands and vegetation indices (VIs). Specifically, we compared the performance of random forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) regression algorithms for peanut LAI estimation. Our results showed that most of the VIs exhibited strong relationships with LAI. Thirteen VIs were individually evaluated for estimating LAI using the aforementioned algorithms, and our results showed that the best single predictors of LAI are: TSAVI (RF: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.87, RMSE = 0.83 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, RRMSE = 24.20%; XGBoost: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77, RMSE = 0.95 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, RRMSE = 27.96%); and RTVIcore (PLSR: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.68, RMSE = 1.12 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, RRMSE = 32.88%). The top six ranked VIs were used to calibrate the RF, XGBoost, and PLSR algorithms. Model validation indicated that RF achieved the highest accuracy (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.844, RMSE = 0.858 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, RRMSE = 25.17%), followed by XGBoost (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.808, RMSE = 0.92 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, RRMSE = 26.99%), whereas PLSR showed comparatively lower performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.76, RMSE = 0.983 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, RRMSE = 28.85%). Further results showed that PlanetScope VIs provided superior model accuracy in estimating peanut LAI compared to the use of spectral bands alone. Additionally, integrating spectral bands with VIs reduced LAI estimation accuracy, underscoring the importance of selecting predictor variables in ensuring optimal model performance. Overall, the presented results are significant for future crop monitoring using RF to reduce overreliance on multiple models for peanut LAI estimation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26031018
Primary Topic
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of PlanetScope Spectral Data for Estimation of Peanut Leaf Area Index Using Machine Learning and Statistical Methods

Godstime K. James, Hansanee Fernando, Oluseun Adeluyi, Jochem Verrelst et al.
Sensors
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
article

Assessment of PlanetScope Spectral Data for Estimation of Peanut Leaf Area Index Using Machine Learning and Statistical Methods

Godstime K. James, Hansanee Fernando, Oluseun Adeluyi, Jochem Verrelst, Angela Kross, Michael C. Ekwe
article en

Abstract

Leaf area index (LAI) is a key indicator of crop growth and development and is widely used in both agricultural research and precision farming applications. PlanetScope imagery is generally used for monitoring crop growth due to its high revisit frequency, broad spatial coverage, and cost-effective access to consistent high-resolution multispectral data. Therefore, we developed regression models to estimate peanut LAI, combining PlanetScope spectral bands and vegetation indices (VIs). Specifically, we compared the performance of random forest (RF), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), and Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) regression algorithms for peanut LAI estimation. Our results showed that most of the VIs exhibited strong relationships with LAI. Thirteen VIs were individually evaluated for estimating LAI using the aforementioned algorithms, and our results showed that the best single predictors of LAI are: TSAVI (RF: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.87, RMSE = 0.83 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, RRMSE = 24.20%; XGBoost: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.77, RMSE = 0.95 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, RRMSE = 27.96%); and RTVIcore (PLSR: R<sup>2</sup> = 0.68, RMSE = 1.12 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, RRMSE = 32.88%). The top six ranked VIs were used to calibrate the RF, XGBoost, and PLSR algorithms. Model validation indicated that RF achieved the highest accuracy (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.844, RMSE = 0.858 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, RRMSE = 25.17%), followed by XGBoost (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.808, RMSE = 0.92 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, RRMSE = 26.99%), whereas PLSR showed comparatively lower performance (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.76, RMSE = 0.983 m<sup>2</sup>/m<sup>2</sup>, RRMSE = 28.85%). Further results showed that PlanetScope VIs provided superior model accuracy in estimating peanut LAI compared to the use of spectral bands alone. Additionally, integrating spectral bands with VIs reduced LAI estimation accuracy, underscoring the importance of selecting predictor variables in ensuring optimal model performance. Overall, the presented results are significant for future crop monitoring using RF to reduce overreliance on multiple models for peanut LAI estimation.

SensorsVol. 26(3)
Parc Científic de la Universitat de València (ES), University of Saskatchewan (CA), National Space Research and Development Agency (NG), Concordia University (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Remote Sensing in Agriculture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.