Accuracy Assessment of Exhaust Valve Geometry Reconstruction: A Comparative Study of Contact and Optical Metrology in Reverse Engineering

Reverse engineering (RE) is essential in the automotive and aerospace industries for reconstructing high-precision components, such as exhaust valves, when design documentation is unavailable. However, different measurement methods introduce varied errors that can affect engine performance and safety. This study presents a comparative analysis of contact and optical measurement systems—specifically the CMM Accura II (ZEISS Group, Oberkochen, Germany), Mahr MarSurf XC 20 (Esslingen am Neckar, Germany), GOM Scan 1 (ZEISS/GOM, Braunschweig/Oberkochen, Germany) and MCA-II with an MMD×100 laser head (Nikon Metrology, Leuven, Belgium)—to assess their accuracy in reconstructing exhaust valve geometry. The research procedure involved measuring global surface deviations and critical functional parameters, including stem diameter, straightness, and seat angle. The results indicate that tactile methods (CMM and Mahr) provide significantly higher accuracy and lower dispersion than optical methods. The Mahr system was the most effective for stem precision, while the CMM was the only system to pass the seat angle tolerance requirement unambiguously. In contrast, the MCA-II laser system failed to meet the required precision–mechanical tolerances. The findings suggest that an optimal industrial strategy should adopt a hybrid methodology: utilizing rapid optical scanning (GOM) for general geometry and high-precision tactile systems (CMM, Mahr) for critical functional features. This approach can reduce total inspection time by 30–40% while ensuring technical safety and preventing catastrophic engine failures.