Does working from home pollute? The environmental effects of WFH

Work-from-home (WFH) arrangements experienced an unprecedented boom since the Covid-19 crisis. This study examines the environmental consequences of WFH, focusing on P M 2 . 5 , the most harmful air pollutant globally. Using the rise in WFH prevalence due to Covid-19 lockdown restrictions, we provide evidence that the expansion of WFH contributes to higher P M 2 . 5 levels. Three findings support this interpretation: (i) the effect is mainly driven by workplace closures, unlike other restrictions; (ii) it is weaker in municipalities with a larger share of essential workers, who kept on going to their workplace during lockdown periods; and (iii) it is stronger where a greater share of the workforce can work remotely. These results suggest that residential emissions offset the expected gains from reduced commuting. They also highlight the need for policymakers to address the environmental challenges associated with WFH, particularly through energy efficiency improvements and cleaner residential heating technologies.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Economic Review
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2026.105266
Primary Topic
COVID-19 impact on air quality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does working from home pollute? The environmental effects of WFH

European Economic Review
COVID-19 impact on air quality
article

Does working from home pollute? The environmental effects of WFH

article en

Abstract

Work-from-home (WFH) arrangements experienced an unprecedented boom since the Covid-19 crisis. This study examines the environmental consequences of WFH, focusing on P M 2 . 5 , the most harmful air pollutant globally. Using the rise in WFH prevalence due to Covid-19 lockdown restrictions, we provide evidence that the expansion of WFH contributes to higher P M 2 . 5 levels. Three findings support this interpretation: (i) the effect is mainly driven by workplace closures, unlike other restrictions; (ii) it is weaker in municipalities with a larger share of essential workers, who kept on going to their workplace during lockdown periods; and (iii) it is stronger where a greater share of the workforce can work remotely. These results suggest that residential emissions offset the expected gains from reduced commuting. They also highlight the need for policymakers to address the environmental challenges associated with WFH, particularly through energy efficiency improvements and cleaner residential heating technologies.

European Economic ReviewVol. 185
Montpellier Business School (FR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 76%
COVID-19 impact on air quality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.