Lung cancer screening care pathways in community settings: An examination of three healthcare systems

Abstract Background Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is recommended for individuals ages 50-80 with a high-risk tobacco history, but implementation of LCS in community settings remains a significant challenge. The benefits of LCS are tempered by both low uptake and low adherence to recommended follow-up, supporting the need for community-engaged research in this area. Objective The objective of this study was to understand LCS workflows throughout the care continuum in representative community-care settings. Design This is a case study informed by multi-method data collection to characterize three community-based LCS programs in Washington state who are participating in a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to enhance LCS program care coordination. Participants This research was conducted in collaboration with three community-based LCS referral programs. Participants included program partners who participated in formalized site visits and interviews. Approach To develop and refine LCS workflows, we triangulated data from rapid ethnographic assessment site visits (n = 5), semi-structured interviews with care providers (n = 15), and member checking with key programmatic partners from each site. Rapid Group Analysis Process was used to integrate findings and guide the development and visualization of LCS workflows. Key Results The three community-based programs provide LCS services for their regional primary care networks with various levels of centralized programmatic support. LCS workflows from each site demonstrate varied staff involvement and resources along the LCS care continuum. Provider interviews identified the need for patient education and outreach, provider support and resources, and attention to gaps in care along the LCS continuum. Conclusions The LCS system-level workflows demonstrate three approaches to LCS care in community settings. LCS workflows can enable the timely identification of barriers and facilitators to improving LCS implementation in community settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/annalsats/aaoag029
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lung cancer screening care pathways in community settings: An examination of three healthcare systems

Meagan C. Brown, Casey Walsh, Tinnie Louie, Triplette Matthew et al.
Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Lung cancer screening care pathways in community settings: An examination of three healthcare systems

Meagan C. Brown, Casey Walsh, Tinnie Louie, Triplette Matthew, Laurel Hansell, Daniel S. Hippe, Katie DeCell, Richard Leone, Lorella Palazzo, Stewart Long, Gloria D Coronado, Saba Lodhi, Nicholas Wysham
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is recommended for individuals ages 50-80 with a high-risk tobacco history, but implementation of LCS in community settings remains a significant challenge. The benefits of LCS are tempered by both low uptake and low adherence to recommended follow-up, supporting the need for community-engaged research in this area. Objective The objective of this study was to understand LCS workflows throughout the care continuum in representative community-care settings. Design This is a case study informed by multi-method data collection to characterize three community-based LCS programs in Washington state who are participating in a hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial to enhance LCS program care coordination. Participants This research was conducted in collaboration with three community-based LCS referral programs. Participants included program partners who participated in formalized site visits and interviews. Approach To develop and refine LCS workflows, we triangulated data from rapid ethnographic assessment site visits (n = 5), semi-structured interviews with care providers (n = 15), and member checking with key programmatic partners from each site. Rapid Group Analysis Process was used to integrate findings and guide the development and visualization of LCS workflows. Key Results The three community-based programs provide LCS services for their regional primary care networks with various levels of centralized programmatic support. LCS workflows from each site demonstrate varied staff involvement and resources along the LCS care continuum. Provider interviews identified the need for patient education and outreach, provider support and resources, and attention to gaps in care along the LCS continuum. Conclusions The LCS system-level workflows demonstrate three approaches to LCS care in community settings. LCS workflows can enable the timely identification of barriers and facilitators to improving LCS implementation in community settings.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society
Cape Town HVTN Immunology Laboratory / Hutchinson Centre Research Institute of South Africa (ZA), University of Arizona (US), Washington State University Spokane (US), University of Washington (US), Skagit Valley Hospital (US), Wenatchee Valley College (US), Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute (US), Fred Hutch Cancer Center (US), Vancouver Clinic (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 68%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.