Machine learning for estimating phytoplankton size structure from satellite ocean color imagery in optically complex Pacific Arctic waters

Abstract. In response to recent advances in satellite ocean color remote sensing, we have developed a chlorophyll a size distribution (CSD) model using machine learning (ML) approaches for optically complex Pacific Arctic waters. Previous CSD models have used principal component analysis (PCA) to retrieve spectral features from satellite-estimated phytoplankton absorption coefficient (aph(λ)) by assuming a strong correlation between the spectral features and phytoplankton size structure determined from the exponent of the CSD (η). A weakness of such approach is that it relies on satellite retrievals of aph(λ), which can be highly uncertain due to the optical effects of water constituents other than phytoplankton. In this study, we have developed a method based on ML to use remote sensing reflectance (Rrs(λ)) for directly retrieving η, thus avoiding uncertainties due to the inversion of aph(λ) from Rrs(λ). Results show superior performance of the ML-based CSD models compared to the PCA-based model utilizing both Rrs(λ) and aph(λ) as predictors of η. For direct Rrs(λ)-based retrievals, a CSD model based on multivariable linear regression produced the best performance among all models considered. Nevertheless, models using in-situ aph(λ) yielded better accuracy, reflecting a closer optical linkage between η and aph(λ) than between η and Rrs(λ). Our choice of an Rrs(λ)-based model for satellite application is therefore practical, motivated by the limitations and uncertainty of aph(λ) inversions in optically complex waters. Another key finding is that more complex ML approaches do not always produce more effective models than standard linear regression. Indeed, multivariable linear regression outperformed other ML approaches for retrieving η directly from Rrs(λ), whereas support vector machine performed the best among diverse ML approaches in the case of aph(λ). Overall, this study found benefits in using Rrs(λ) with ML to improve the retrieval accuracy of η for Pacific Arctic waters.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Biogeosciences
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-23-1043-2026
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Machine learning for estimating phytoplankton size structure from satellite ocean color imagery in optically complex Pacific Arctic waters

Kyle J. Turner, Wesley J. Moses, Amane Fujiwara, Steven G. Ackleson et al.
Biogeosciences
Marine and coastal ecosystems
article

Machine learning for estimating phytoplankton size structure from satellite ocean color imagery in optically complex Pacific Arctic waters

Kyle J. Turner, Wesley J. Moses, Amane Fujiwara, Steven G. Ackleson, Koji Suzuki, Alana B Menendez, Hisatomo Waga, Daniel Koestner, Toru Hirawake, Sei-Ichi Saitoh, Maria Tzortziou
article en

Abstract

Abstract. In response to recent advances in satellite ocean color remote sensing, we have developed a chlorophyll a size distribution (CSD) model using machine learning (ML) approaches for optically complex Pacific Arctic waters. Previous CSD models have used principal component analysis (PCA) to retrieve spectral features from satellite-estimated phytoplankton absorption coefficient (aph(λ)) by assuming a strong correlation between the spectral features and phytoplankton size structure determined from the exponent of the CSD (η). A weakness of such approach is that it relies on satellite retrievals of aph(λ), which can be highly uncertain due to the optical effects of water constituents other than phytoplankton. In this study, we have developed a method based on ML to use remote sensing reflectance (Rrs(λ)) for directly retrieving η, thus avoiding uncertainties due to the inversion of aph(λ) from Rrs(λ). Results show superior performance of the ML-based CSD models compared to the PCA-based model utilizing both Rrs(λ) and aph(λ) as predictors of η. For direct Rrs(λ)-based retrievals, a CSD model based on multivariable linear regression produced the best performance among all models considered. Nevertheless, models using in-situ aph(λ) yielded better accuracy, reflecting a closer optical linkage between η and aph(λ) than between η and Rrs(λ). Our choice of an Rrs(λ)-based model for satellite application is therefore practical, motivated by the limitations and uncertainty of aph(λ) inversions in optically complex waters. Another key finding is that more complex ML approaches do not always produce more effective models than standard linear regression. Indeed, multivariable linear regression outperformed other ML approaches for retrieving η directly from Rrs(λ), whereas support vector machine performed the best among diverse ML approaches in the case of aph(λ). Overall, this study found benefits in using Rrs(λ) with ML to improve the retrieval accuracy of η for Pacific Arctic waters.

BiogeosciencesVol. 23(3)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Marine and coastal ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.