Cover crops, chemicals, and emissions in Pottawatomie County, Kansas, USA

Cover crops have numerous benefits, including enhanced erosion control, forage biomass, nitrogen fixation, nutrient recycling, weed suppression, water management, temperature moderation, and carbon sequestration. Still, the adoption of cover crops by farmers is significantly influenced by their individual goals and preferences, their specific agroecological contexts, and larger agro-industrial structures and systems. Farmers in Pottawatomie County, Kansas, planted cover crops on 8.2% of the county’s cropland in 2022 (nearly twice the national average). This study sought to understand what these farmers were looking for in cover crops by specifically choosing to interview them. Utiliz­ing information gleaned from inter­views with 22 farmers and/or cover crop experts, I was able to thematically analyze the resulting data. Coding revealed that many interviewees were on the “chemical herbicide treadmill” for cover crop suppression and/or termination. I used this infor­mation as a theoretical framework to inform descriptive analyses of farm characteristics, crop types, farmland use, and emissions. After compar­ing trends and themes, I found that interviewees looked for cover crops to be affordable if not prof­itable, suitable for use as a supplement forage biomass/nutrition for cattle, and ideally subsidized by cost-share programs (~US$50/acre). Weather and labor availability and labor cost were also key influ­ences. When grazing or crimping cover crops was not an option for their suppression or termination, interviewees preferred using herbicides over mini­mum tillage. This preference was reflected in the 1997–2022 county-level trends of increased herbi­cide application rates and expenses, notable changes in the primary cropland type from hay(lage) to corn and soybeans, and accelerated leaching emissions. Finally, I discussed implications for adopting soil health principles that trended more organic than regenerative, and offered resources for cover crop education, outreach, and cost share.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5304/jafscd.2026.152.002
Primary Topic
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cover crops, chemicals, and emissions in Pottawatomie County, Kansas, USA

Jacob Miller-Klugesherz
Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
article

Cover crops, chemicals, and emissions in Pottawatomie County, Kansas, USA

Jacob Miller-Klugesherz
article en

Abstract

Cover crops have numerous benefits, including enhanced erosion control, forage biomass, nitrogen fixation, nutrient recycling, weed suppression, water management, temperature moderation, and carbon sequestration. Still, the adoption of cover crops by farmers is significantly influenced by their individual goals and preferences, their specific agroecological contexts, and larger agro-industrial structures and systems. Farmers in Pottawatomie County, Kansas, planted cover crops on 8.2% of the county’s cropland in 2022 (nearly twice the national average). This study sought to understand what these farmers were looking for in cover crops by specifically choosing to interview them. Utiliz­ing information gleaned from inter­views with 22 farmers and/or cover crop experts, I was able to thematically analyze the resulting data. Coding revealed that many interviewees were on the “chemical herbicide treadmill” for cover crop suppression and/or termination. I used this infor­mation as a theoretical framework to inform descriptive analyses of farm characteristics, crop types, farmland use, and emissions. After compar­ing trends and themes, I found that interviewees looked for cover crops to be affordable if not prof­itable, suitable for use as a supplement forage biomass/nutrition for cattle, and ideally subsidized by cost-share programs (~US$50/acre). Weather and labor availability and labor cost were also key influ­ences. When grazing or crimping cover crops was not an option for their suppression or termination, interviewees preferred using herbicides over mini­mum tillage. This preference was reflected in the 1997–2022 county-level trends of increased herbi­cide application rates and expenses, notable changes in the primary cropland type from hay(lage) to corn and soybeans, and accelerated leaching emissions. Finally, I discussed implications for adopting soil health principles that trended more organic than regenerative, and offered resources for cover crop education, outreach, and cost share.

Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development
Kansas Wesleyan University (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Cover crops, chemicals, and emissions in Pottawatomie County, Kansas, USA — Jacob Miller-Klugesherz · Journal of Agriculture Food Systems and Community Development (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS