Non-invasive neurostimulation techniques for the treatment of stimulant use disorders

Addictive disorders remain important contributors to the overall burden of disease, and although many have established treatments, stimulant use disorders (StUDs) still lack effective management options. Neurostimulation techniques, such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, have attracted addiction medicine researchers and clinicians, with many studies showing promise in reducing cravings and improving other clinical outcomes in participants, as well as modulating relevant brain areas. As a result, research output in this area is increasing rapidly. This narrative review aims to assess currently available research data on non-invasive neurostimulation techniques in patients with StUDs to inform future research requirements and clinical applications. This review was conducted using a comprehensive search strategy across PubMed, OVID Medline and PsycINFO databases, using terms including "stimulant use disorder*", "transcranial magnetic stimulation" and "craving*". The initial search was intentionally broad to effectively assess the breadth of literature on neurostimulation in addiction disorders generally, resulting in the return of 1317 sources. Search results were uploaded to Covidence and screened for inclusion. Upon narrowing the scope to isolate StUDs, 179 sources were included for full-text review, with 90 included for extraction. The most common outcome measure assessed was craving, with cognition, affective symptoms, sleep, and use patterns other frequently assessed measures. Overall, the results appear promising, with non-invasive neurostimulation variably improving cravings, cognition and affective outcomes in patients with StUDs. However, this review identified some limitations that require further research attention, including small sample sizes, short follow-up periods, protocol heterogeneity, and ill-representative samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2026.1755441
Primary Topic
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-invasive neurostimulation techniques for the treatment of stimulant use disorders

Hannah Bereznicki, Robert M. Lundin, Jordan Hendy
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
article

Non-invasive neurostimulation techniques for the treatment of stimulant use disorders

Hannah Bereznicki, Robert M. Lundin, Jordan Hendy
article en

Abstract

Addictive disorders remain important contributors to the overall burden of disease, and although many have established treatments, stimulant use disorders (StUDs) still lack effective management options. Neurostimulation techniques, such as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, have attracted addiction medicine researchers and clinicians, with many studies showing promise in reducing cravings and improving other clinical outcomes in participants, as well as modulating relevant brain areas. As a result, research output in this area is increasing rapidly. This narrative review aims to assess currently available research data on non-invasive neurostimulation techniques in patients with StUDs to inform future research requirements and clinical applications. This review was conducted using a comprehensive search strategy across PubMed, OVID Medline and PsycINFO databases, using terms including "stimulant use disorder*", "transcranial magnetic stimulation" and "craving*". The initial search was intentionally broad to effectively assess the breadth of literature on neurostimulation in addiction disorders generally, resulting in the return of 1317 sources. Search results were uploaded to Covidence and screened for inclusion. Upon narrowing the scope to isolate StUDs, 179 sources were included for full-text review, with 90 included for extraction. The most common outcome measure assessed was craving, with cognition, affective symptoms, sleep, and use patterns other frequently assessed measures. Overall, the results appear promising, with non-invasive neurostimulation variably improving cravings, cognition and affective outcomes in patients with StUDs. However, this review identified some limitations that require further research attention, including small sample sizes, short follow-up periods, protocol heterogeneity, and ill-representative samples.

Frontiers in PsychiatryVol. 17
Deakin University (AU), Institute for Research, Education and Training in Addictions (US), Otsuka Pharmaceutical (Spain) (ES), Monash University (AU)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 72%
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.