Crowdsourced reviews reveal substantial disparities in public perceptions of parking

Due to increased reliance on private vehicles and growing travel demand, parking remains a longstanding urban challenge globally. Quantifying parking perceptions is paramount as it enables decision-makers to identify problematic areas and make informed decisions on parking management. This study introduces a cost-effective and widely accessible data source, crowdsourced online reviews, to investigate public perceptions of parking across the U.S. Specifically, we examine 4,987,483 parking-related reviews for 1,129,460 points of interest (POIs) across 911 core-based statistical areas (CBSAs) sourced from Google Maps. We employ the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model to classify the parking sentiment and conduct regression analyses to explore its relationships with socio-spatial factors. Findings reveal significant variations in parking sentiment across POI types and CBSAs, with Restaurants showing the most negative. Regression results further indicate that denser urban areas with higher proportions of African Americans and Hispanics and lower socioeconomic status are more likely to exhibit negative parking sentiment. Interestingly, an opposite relationship between parking supply and sentiment is observed, indicating that increasing supply is not always associated with improved parking experiences. Finally, our textual analysis identifies keywords associated with positive or negative sentiments and highlights disparities between urban and rural areas. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of a novel data source and methodological framework in measuring parking sentiment, offering valuable insights that help identify hyperlocal parking issues and guide targeted parking management strategies. • Analyze 4.98 m Google Maps reviews to quantify U.S. parking sentiment across 911 CBSAs. • Restaurant POIs are more negative; Personal Service and Recreation POIs are more positive. • Dense, low-income, minority areas show worse sentiment; rural tracts fare better. • Extra parking supply does not raise sentiment; demand-side management is essential. • Text analysis highlights space, cost, and convenience issues.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cities
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2026.106866
Primary Topic
Smart Parking Systems Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crowdsourced reviews reveal substantial disparities in public perceptions of parking

Lingyao Li, Songhua Hu, Ly Dinh, Libby Hemphill
Cities
Smart Parking Systems Research
article

Crowdsourced reviews reveal substantial disparities in public perceptions of parking

Lingyao Li, Songhua Hu, Ly Dinh, Libby Hemphill
article en

Abstract

Due to increased reliance on private vehicles and growing travel demand, parking remains a longstanding urban challenge globally. Quantifying parking perceptions is paramount as it enables decision-makers to identify problematic areas and make informed decisions on parking management. This study introduces a cost-effective and widely accessible data source, crowdsourced online reviews, to investigate public perceptions of parking across the U.S. Specifically, we examine 4,987,483 parking-related reviews for 1,129,460 points of interest (POIs) across 911 core-based statistical areas (CBSAs) sourced from Google Maps. We employ the Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) model to classify the parking sentiment and conduct regression analyses to explore its relationships with socio-spatial factors. Findings reveal significant variations in parking sentiment across POI types and CBSAs, with Restaurants showing the most negative. Regression results further indicate that denser urban areas with higher proportions of African Americans and Hispanics and lower socioeconomic status are more likely to exhibit negative parking sentiment. Interestingly, an opposite relationship between parking supply and sentiment is observed, indicating that increasing supply is not always associated with improved parking experiences. Finally, our textual analysis identifies keywords associated with positive or negative sentiments and highlights disparities between urban and rural areas. Overall, this study demonstrates the potential of a novel data source and methodological framework in measuring parking sentiment, offering valuable insights that help identify hyperlocal parking issues and guide targeted parking management strategies. • Analyze 4.98 m Google Maps reviews to quantify U.S. parking sentiment across 911 CBSAs. • Restaurant POIs are more negative; Personal Service and Recreation POIs are more positive. • Dense, low-income, minority areas show worse sentiment; rural tracts fare better. • Extra parking supply does not raise sentiment; demand-side management is essential. • Text analysis highlights space, cost, and convenience issues.

CitiesVol. 171
University of South Florida (US), University of Michigan (US), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Smart Parking Systems Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.