Monocyte distribution width reference intervals in healthy Chinese adults: a study revealing the impact of anticoagulant choice
Monocyte distribution width (MDW) is a promising biomarker for early sepsis detection, but its use in Asian populations has been limited due to the lack of region-specific reference intervals (RIs). This study aimed to establish the first MDW RI for healthy Chinese adults using EDTA-K<sub>2</sub> anticoagulant, strictly following CLSI EP28-A3C guidelines. A total of 262 samples from healthy Chinese blood donors were analyzed using a Beckman Coulter DxH 900 analyzer. Statistical methods included Shapiro-Wilk tests for normality, t-tests, ANOVA for group differences, and Spearman correlation analysis, with RIs calculated using parametric, non-parametric, and robust methods. The parametric RI limits were determined to be 14.48 (90% CI 14.16-14.80) and 21.56 (90% CI 21.24-21.88), closely aligning with results from the robust method (14.41-21.55) and non-parametric method (14.70-21.52). Our findings are consistent with Spanish data obtained using EDTA-K<sub>2</sub> anticoagulant but differ from Italian data that used EDTA-K<sub>3</sub>, highlighting the potential impact of anticoagulant type on MDW values. This RI is unaffected by gender or age, providing a critical diagnostic tool for early sepsis detection in Chinese clinical practice and emphasizing the need for further studies to investigate anticoagulant influences for global standardization.
Authors
- Jun Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9401-3528)
- Xin Li (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7647-8620)
- Wen Jiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0612-2917)
- Cuihua Tao
- Shanshan Dong
- Kun Luo
- Qimei Wei
Institutions
- Wuhan University (CN)
- Wuhan Asia Heart Hospital (CN)
- Wuhan Blood Center (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation
- Published
- 2026-01-02
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00365513.2026.2623606
- Primary Topic
- Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00