How to design a trigger warning: An experimental study on the impact of trigger warning wording on affect, expectations, intrusions, and felt respect

Trigger warnings (TWs) aim to alert individuals to potentially distressing content. Most studies found no beneficial effects; some have even reported adverse effects. However, due to their increasing use, there is a large heterogeneity in wording and design across contexts. Inspired by expectation research, this study examined the impact of different TW formulations on negative affect, expectations, symptom experiences (i.e. intrusions), and perceived respect and autonomy. Using the trauma film paradigm, <i>N</i> = 143 healthy participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) TW with content and emotional reaction details, (2) TW without details, or (3) no TW. There were no group differences in negative affect. Between the TW conditions, participants who received the less specific TW reported lower coping expectations, more intrusions, and greater distress over three days. The wording of a TW seems to have differential effects. Providing both content information and expected emotional reactions appears to be more beneficial.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2026.2623113
Primary Topic
Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How to design a trigger warning: An experimental study on the impact of trigger warning wording on affect, expectations, intrusions, and felt respect

Philipp Herzog, Hannah Willems, Julia A. Glombiewski, Richard J. McNally
Cognition & Emotion
Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
article

How to design a trigger warning: An experimental study on the impact of trigger warning wording on affect, expectations, intrusions, and felt respect

Philipp Herzog, Hannah Willems, Julia A. Glombiewski, Richard J. McNally
article en

Abstract

Trigger warnings (TWs) aim to alert individuals to potentially distressing content. Most studies found no beneficial effects; some have even reported adverse effects. However, due to their increasing use, there is a large heterogeneity in wording and design across contexts. Inspired by expectation research, this study examined the impact of different TW formulations on negative affect, expectations, symptom experiences (i.e. intrusions), and perceived respect and autonomy. Using the trauma film paradigm, <i>N</i> = 143 healthy participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: (1) TW with content and emotional reaction details, (2) TW without details, or (3) no TW. There were no group differences in negative affect. Between the TW conditions, participants who received the less specific TW reported lower coping expectations, more intrusions, and greater distress over three days. The wording of a TW seems to have differential effects. Providing both content information and expected emotional reactions appears to be more beneficial.

Cognition & Emotion
University of Kaiserslautern (DE), Harvard University Press (US), University of Koblenz and Landau (DE), Rheinland-Pfälzische Technische Universität Kaiserslautern-Landau (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 69%
Educational Philosophies and Pedagogies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.