A Scoping Review of Nudges for Enhancing Agricultural Policy

ABSTRACT Following PRISMA guidelines, we conduct a scoping review on 18 empirical studies on nudging interventions for farmers in Europe and the USA. The evidence on the effectiveness of nudges is mixed. Some studies demonstrate positive outcomes, particularly when nudges are combined with other interventions; others report no effect or negative outcomes. We identified several gaps in the literature. For example, the cost‐effectiveness, acceptability, persistence of behavioral change, and unintended effects of nudging interventions remain largely unexamined. Moreover, most studies have limited real‐world applicability, and few use representative samples of farmers. Additionally, transparency is limited, for example, few studies are pre‐registered and share data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Published
2025-08-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/aepp.70015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Agricultural risk and resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.19
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Scoping Review of Nudges for Enhancing Agricultural Policy

Jeanine Ammann, Robert Finger, Gabriele Mack, Nadja El Benni et al.
1 citations
Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy
Agricultural risk and resilience
1.19
article

A Scoping Review of Nudges for Enhancing Agricultural Policy

Jeanine Ammann, Robert Finger, Gabriele Mack, Nadja El Benni, Yanbing Wang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Following PRISMA guidelines, we conduct a scoping review on 18 empirical studies on nudging interventions for farmers in Europe and the USA. The evidence on the effectiveness of nudges is mixed. Some studies demonstrate positive outcomes, particularly when nudges are combined with other interventions; others report no effect or negative outcomes. We identified several gaps in the literature. For example, the cost‐effectiveness, acceptability, persistence of behavioral change, and unintended effects of nudging interventions remain largely unexamined. Moreover, most studies have limited real‐world applicability, and few use representative samples of farmers. Additionally, transparency is limited, for example, few studies are pre‐registered and share data.

Applied Economic Perspectives and PolicyVol. 48(1)
ETH Zurich (CH), Agroscope (CH), Institute for Sustainability (GB)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Agricultural risk and resilience
1.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.