EXPLORING THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF COMBINED MSI AND KRAS/BRAF MUTATIONAL STATUS IN COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health concern, and constant improvement in treatment and prediction is needed. Though resection with adjuvant therapy is the standard for resectable CRC, optimal patient benefit and the development of individualized strategies remain relevant. Microsatellite Instability (MSI) has emerged as a significant molecular marker but requires more definitive clarification of its prognostic interaction with other mutations like BRAF and KRAS. Objective: The objective of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively assess the prognostic value of MSI status, as well as KRAS and BRAF mutations, on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with CRC after surgical resection. Methods: Systematic literature review was performed, and research was identified on the basis of predefined eligibility criteria. Data for OS, PFS, MSI status, and KRAS/BRAF mutation were gathered. Fixed-effect meta-analysis was conducted to calculate summary HRs and 95% CIs. Risk bias was assessed using standardized tools, and publication bias was tested. Results: The meta-analysis revealed that MSI-high (MSI-H) status was also significantly associated with improved OS (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.60 - 0.77; p<0.05) and improved PFS (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.53 - 0.94; p<0.05) compared to microsatellite stable/low (MSS/MSI-L) tumors. Conversely, the presence of a BRAF mutation was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.20 - 1.83; p<0.05). KRAS mutational status was not found to have a statistically significant independent association with either OS (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.98 - 1.42) or PFS (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.92 - 1.32) in this pooled analysis. BRAF mutation was not found to have an impact on PFS (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.84 - 1.25). No publication bias was detected to be significant. Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows compelling evidence that MSI-H status is an independent favorable prognostic marker for OS and PFS in patients with resected CRC. By contrast, BRAF mutation is a potent indicator of poor OS. These findings underscore the significance of standard molecular profiling, and particularly MSI and BRAF status, to more accurately refine prognostic stratification and potentially impact personalized adjuvant treatment decisions in CRC therapy. Further research into the individual subtypes of KRAS mutations and their interaction with MSI status is required.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18479911
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPLORING THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF COMBINED MSI AND KRAS/BRAF MUTATIONAL STATUS IN COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS

Margaret Mekuriya Bassaye, MD1*, Zhou Li2, Shuai Han2, Sm. Willard Kaphera3,4
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
article

EXPLORING THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF COMBINED MSI AND KRAS/BRAF MUTATIONAL STATUS IN COLORECTAL CANCER PATIENTS

Margaret Mekuriya Bassaye, MD1*, Zhou Li2, Shuai Han2, Sm. Willard Kaphera3,4
article en

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a significant global health concern, and constant improvement in treatment and prediction is needed. Though resection with adjuvant therapy is the standard for resectable CRC, optimal patient benefit and the development of individualized strategies remain relevant. Microsatellite Instability (MSI) has emerged as a significant molecular marker but requires more definitive clarification of its prognostic interaction with other mutations like BRAF and KRAS. Objective: The objective of this meta-analysis was to comprehensively assess the prognostic value of MSI status, as well as KRAS and BRAF mutations, on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with CRC after surgical resection. Methods: Systematic literature review was performed, and research was identified on the basis of predefined eligibility criteria. Data for OS, PFS, MSI status, and KRAS/BRAF mutation were gathered. Fixed-effect meta-analysis was conducted to calculate summary HRs and 95% CIs. Risk bias was assessed using standardized tools, and publication bias was tested. Results: The meta-analysis revealed that MSI-high (MSI-H) status was also significantly associated with improved OS (HR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.60 - 0.77; p<0.05) and improved PFS (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.53 - 0.94; p<0.05) compared to microsatellite stable/low (MSS/MSI-L) tumors. Conversely, the presence of a BRAF mutation was significantly associated with poorer OS (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.20 - 1.83; p<0.05). KRAS mutational status was not found to have a statistically significant independent association with either OS (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.98 - 1.42) or PFS (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 0.92 - 1.32) in this pooled analysis. BRAF mutation was not found to have an impact on PFS (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.84 - 1.25). No publication bias was detected to be significant. Conclusion: This meta-analysis shows compelling evidence that MSI-H status is an independent favorable prognostic marker for OS and PFS in patients with resected CRC. By contrast, BRAF mutation is a potent indicator of poor OS. These findings underscore the significance of standard molecular profiling, and particularly MSI and BRAF status, to more accurately refine prognostic stratification and potentially impact personalized adjuvant treatment decisions in CRC therapy. Further research into the individual subtypes of KRAS mutations and their interaction with MSI status is required.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.