Assessment of ecosystem status in Mozambique and implications for environmental planning

Abstract The Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) set the agenda for global aspirations and actions to reverse environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. It places a clear focus on ecosystems, with several goals and targets aimed at enhancing ecosystem area, integrity, connectivity, and resilience. Achieving these ambitions will require a robust understanding of ecosystem type, distribution and status, and mainstreaming of ecosystem data into reporting and decision‐making processes. Here, we assess Mozambique's terrestrial ecosystems using the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems framework and demonstrate how the results are being used to inform environmental decision‐making and GBF implementation. By assessing ecosystem loss, degradation, and the impacts of climate change, our findings show that more than half of Mozambique's ecosystems are threatened, with impacts primarily concentrated in temperate subhumid grasslands and pyric tussock savannas. Some ecosystem groups, such as tropical‐subtropical lowland rainforests, while less affected by range reduction, are threatened due to their naturally restricted distributions and ongoing degradation. Coverage of threatened ecosystems within protected areas and Key Biodiversity Areas is substantially insufficient, highlighting clear priorities for expansion to achieve GBF targets. These results are now being used to influence national conservation policies and regulate private‐sector conservation efforts. This demonstrates how systematic Red List of Ecosystem assessments can inform robust environmental decision‐making and conservation planning, providing a valuable model for other countries aiming to implement the GBF and enhance ecosystem‐based conservation strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Science and Practice
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.70189
Primary Topic
Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of ecosystem status in Mozambique and implications for environmental planning

Denise Nicolau, Hermenegildo Matimele, Kendall R. Jones, Eleutério Duarte et al.
Conservation Science and Practice
Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
article

Assessment of ecosystem status in Mozambique and implications for environmental planning

Denise Nicolau, Hermenegildo Matimele, Kendall R. Jones, Eleutério Duarte, Hedley S. Grantham, Gautam Surya, Mervyn Lötter, Muri Soares, Tereza Alves, Vanessa Rathbone, Célia CF. Macamo, Roberto Zolho, Hugo M. Costa
article en

Abstract

Abstract The Kunming‐Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (GBF) set the agenda for global aspirations and actions to reverse environmental degradation and biodiversity loss. It places a clear focus on ecosystems, with several goals and targets aimed at enhancing ecosystem area, integrity, connectivity, and resilience. Achieving these ambitions will require a robust understanding of ecosystem type, distribution and status, and mainstreaming of ecosystem data into reporting and decision‐making processes. Here, we assess Mozambique's terrestrial ecosystems using the IUCN Red List of Ecosystems framework and demonstrate how the results are being used to inform environmental decision‐making and GBF implementation. By assessing ecosystem loss, degradation, and the impacts of climate change, our findings show that more than half of Mozambique's ecosystems are threatened, with impacts primarily concentrated in temperate subhumid grasslands and pyric tussock savannas. Some ecosystem groups, such as tropical‐subtropical lowland rainforests, while less affected by range reduction, are threatened due to their naturally restricted distributions and ongoing degradation. Coverage of threatened ecosystems within protected areas and Key Biodiversity Areas is substantially insufficient, highlighting clear priorities for expansion to achieve GBF targets. These results are now being used to influence national conservation policies and regulate private‐sector conservation efforts. This demonstrates how systematic Red List of Ecosystem assessments can inform robust environmental decision‐making and conservation planning, providing a valuable model for other countries aiming to implement the GBF and enhance ecosystem‐based conservation strategies.

Conservation Science and Practice
International Union for Conservation of Nature (Bangladesh) (BD), Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development (PL), Bush Heritage Australia (AU), Wildlife Conservation Society (US), The University of Melbourne (AU), Eduardo Mondlane University (MZ), University of the Witwatersrand (ZA), University of Mpumalanga (ZA), UNSW Sydney (AU), International Union for Conservation of Nature (United States) (US), National Directorate of Geology (MZ), Instituto de Investigação Agrária de Moçambique (MZ), Ecosystem Sciences (AU)
United States Agency for International Development, Agence Française de Développement, Fonds Français pour l'Environnement Mondial
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Aquatic Ecosystems and Biodiversity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.