Cost and affordability of plant-based diets: global evidence from 2000 to 2025

Plant-based diets (PBDs) offer substantial health and environmental benefits. However, their adoption remains limited, partly due to perceived high costs. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the cost and affordability of PBDs relative to conventional omnivorous diets across three analytical domains: empirical expenditure studies, economic modeling projections, and consumer spending patterns. Evidence from studies published between 2000 and 2025 indicates that whole-food PBDs are generally associated with lower food expenditures than omnivorous diets across diverse geographic contexts. However, results vary by socioeconomic status and reliance on processed plant-based alternatives. Cost reductions are primarily driven by eliminating expensive animal products, with savings often exceeding increased spending on fruits, vegetables, and legumes. Global modeling incorporating health and environmental externalities further demonstrates that PBDs are more cost-effective than current omnivorous diets when external costs are considered. Despite empirical evidence of affordability, consumer misperceptions persist as significant barriers to PBD adoption, particularly in high-income countries where expensive specialty products are more visible and heavily marketed. These findings have critical implications for public health policy and interventions aiming to promote sustainable dietary patterns through education and pricing strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academia Nutrition and Dietetics
Published
2026-02-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20935/acadnutr8137
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost and affordability of plant-based diets: global evidence from 2000 to 2025

David Goldman, Matthew Nagra
Academia Nutrition and Dietetics
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Cost and affordability of plant-based diets: global evidence from 2000 to 2025

David Goldman, Matthew Nagra
article en

Abstract

Plant-based diets (PBDs) offer substantial health and environmental benefits. However, their adoption remains limited, partly due to perceived high costs. This narrative review synthesizes current evidence on the cost and affordability of PBDs relative to conventional omnivorous diets across three analytical domains: empirical expenditure studies, economic modeling projections, and consumer spending patterns. Evidence from studies published between 2000 and 2025 indicates that whole-food PBDs are generally associated with lower food expenditures than omnivorous diets across diverse geographic contexts. However, results vary by socioeconomic status and reliance on processed plant-based alternatives. Cost reductions are primarily driven by eliminating expensive animal products, with savings often exceeding increased spending on fruits, vegetables, and legumes. Global modeling incorporating health and environmental externalities further demonstrates that PBDs are more cost-effective than current omnivorous diets when external costs are considered. Despite empirical evidence of affordability, consumer misperceptions persist as significant barriers to PBD adoption, particularly in high-income countries where expensive specialty products are more visible and heavily marketed. These findings have critical implications for public health policy and interventions aiming to promote sustainable dietary patterns through education and pricing strategies.

Academia Nutrition and DieteticsVol. 3(1)
National Development and Research Institutes (US), University of Helsinki (FI), University of British Columbia (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 70%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.